Paper · 2000 · Weed Technology

Control of Imazethapyr-Resistant Common Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in Soybean (Glycine max) and Corn (Zea mays)1

KASSIM AL-KHATIB; DALLAS E. PETERSON; DAVID L. REGEHR

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1997 and 1998 near Rossville in northeast Kansas to evaluate control of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower with selected herbicides in corn and soybean. In soybean, common sunflower control was unacceptable with imazethapyr, chlorimuron, CGA-277476, and cloransulam applied alone. Lactofen or acifluorfen applied with these herbicides slightly improved control, whereas glyphosate applied with them controlled more than 97% of common sunflower. All herbicides reduced common sunflower populations in the corn. The greatest reductions occurred when atrazine was applied with dicamba, 2,4-D, RPA 201772, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron. These herbicide combinations also stunted common sunflower that survived treatment. Several herbicide alternatives are available to control imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower in corn. However, glyphosate was the only herbicide that gave adequate control in soybean.Nomenclature: Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid; atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine; CGA-152005, 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]-urea; CGA-277476, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid,3-oxetanyl-ester; chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino] carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid; cloransulam, 3-chloro-2-[[(5-ethoxy-7-fluoro[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2yl)sulfonyl] amino]benzoic acid; 2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid; dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid; glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine; imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid; lactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl-5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoate; primisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid; RPA 201772, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulphonyl-4-trifluoromethyl-benzoyl)isoxazole; common sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Cargill 6997’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Stine 3264’.Additional index words: Acifluorfen, atrazine, bromoxynil, CGA-152005, CGA-277476, chlorimuron, clopyralid, cloransulam, 2,4-D, dicamba, flumetsulam, glyphosate, imazethapyr, lactofen, metolachlor, primisulfuron, RPA 201772, rimsulfuron, thifensulfuron.Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; DAP, days after planting; DAT, days after treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean, control of common sunflower was unacceptable with imazethapyr, chlorimuron, CGA-277476 or cloransulam applied alone.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
imazethapyr, chlorimuron, CGA-277476, and cloransulam applied alonee0
Interactor
common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
Outcome
common sunflower controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“In soybean, common sunflower control was unacceptable with imazethapyr, chlorimuron, CGA-277476, and cloransulam applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean, lactofen or acifluorfen applied with the other herbicides slightly improved control of common sunflower.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Lactofen or acifluorfen applied with these herbicidese0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lactofen or acifluorfen applied with these herbicides slightly improved control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean, glyphosate applied with the other herbicides controlled more than 97% of common sunflower.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
glyphosate applied with theme0
Interactor
common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
Outcome
controlled more than 97% of common sunflowere0
Value
more than 97%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean (Glycine max)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“glyphosate applied with them controlled more than 97% of common sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn, all tested herbicides reduced common sunflower populations.

Treatment
All herbicidese0
Interactor
common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
Outcome
common sunflower populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“All herbicides reduced common sunflower populations in the corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn, the greatest reductions in common sunflower occurred when atrazine was applied with dicamba, 2,4-D, RPA 201772 or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron.

Treatment
atrazine was applied with dicamba, 2,4-D, RPA 201772, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfurone0
Outcome
reductionse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“The greatest reductions occurred when atrazine was applied with dicamba, 2,4-D, RPA 201772, or CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn, the best atrazine combinations also stunted the common sunflower plants that survived treatment.

Treatment
These herbicide combinationse0
Interactor
common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
Outcome
stunted common sunflowere0
Direction
stuntede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“These herbicide combinations also stunted common sunflower that survived treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate was the only herbicide that gave adequate control of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
adequate controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate was the only herbicide that gave adequate control in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–944 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Several herbicide alternatives are available to control imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower in corn.

Interactor
common sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
Outcome
control imazethapyr-resistant common sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · InteractorJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Several herbicide alternatives are available to control imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–862 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · Helianthus annuus · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

acifluorfen · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

glyphosate · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 70 positive, 6 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

glyphosate · Helianthus annuus · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · Helianthus annuus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.