Paper · 1999 · Revista Brasileira De Fisiologia Vegetal

Carbon isotope discrimination and gas exchange in Coffea species grown under different irradiance regimes

Maria Carelli; Joel Irineu Fahl; Paulo César Ocheuze Trivelin; et al.

20
claims
32
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two coffee species (Coffea arabica L. cv. Catuai Vermelho and Coffea canephora L. cv. Apoata) were grown in pots placed outdoor under three irradiance regimes, full sunlight (S), 50% of shade (50% S) and 80% of shade (80% S), and evaluated for stable carbon isotope discrimination (Δ), photosynthetic gas exchange, and growth. The rate of CO 2 assimilation in S and 50% S plants was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora, but there was no difference between the two species in 80% S. Both species showed similar response to the irradiance regimes. CO 2 assimilation rate at 80% S was 0.49 and 0.58 of CO 2 assimilation in full sunlight, respectively, for C. arabica and C. canephora. There was no significant difference in CO 2 assimilation between S and 50% S plants for either species. Stomatal conductance in C. arabica increased with the irradiance level, but the increase was less evident than that observed for CO 2 assimilation. Consequently, the CO 2 assimilation/stomatal conductance ratio (A/g), expressing intrinsic water use efficiency, was greater in the S plants and 50% S plants than in the 80% S plants. Irradiance regimes did not affect stomatal conductance in C. canephora, which had a lower A/g ratio than C. arabica for the same irradiance regime. Leaf Δ values were lower in S plants than in 80% S plants for both species, but there was no difference between S and 50% S treatments. The decrease in Δ was associated with a greater increase in the CO 2 assimilation rate (106%) than in the stomatal conductance (54%) in C. arabica. In C. canephora the decrease in Δ was associated with an increase in CO 2 assimilation (73%), because stomatal conductance values were not influenced by the irradiance regime. Leaf tissue Δ was negatively correlated with instantaneous measurements of CO 2 assimilation (r = - 0.92; P = 0.0109) and with stomatal conductance (r = - 0.80; P = 0.0570). Full sunlight grown plants exhibited higher leaf nitrogen content than 80% S plants. The increase in leaf nitrogen content with increasing irradiance levels was strongly correlated with CO 2 assimilation rate (r = 0.99, P = 0.0007) and negatively with Δ (r = - 0.94, P = 0.0071). Additional index terms: CO 2 assimilation rate, growth, leaf N, stomatal conductance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In full sunlight and 50% shade, carbon assimilation was higher in C. arabica than C. canephora.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Material
C. arabicae0
Outcome
rate of CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
S and 50% S plantse0
Comparator
C. canephorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The rate of CO 2 assimilation in S and 50% S plants was higher in C. arabica than in C. canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–424 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80% shade, carbon assimilation did not differ between the two coffee species.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Outcome
no difference between the two speciese0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
80% Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no difference between the two species in 80% S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon assimilation of C. arabica at 80% shade was 0.49 of its full-sunlight rate.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
80% Se0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation ratee0
Value
0.49e0
Comparator
full sunlighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation rate at 80% S was 0.49 and 0.58 of CO 2 assimilation in full sunlight, respectively, for C. arabica and C. canephora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon assimilation of C. canephora at 80% shade was 0.58 of its full-sunlight rate.

Taxon
C. canephoraCoffea canephorae0
Treatment
80% Se0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation ratee0
Value
0.58e0
Comparator
full sunlighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation rate at 80% S was 0.49 and 0.58 of CO 2 assimilation in full sunlight, respectively, for C. arabica and C. canephora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–687 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilation did not differ significantly between full sunlight and 50% shade for either coffee species.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
50% Se0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no significant difference in CO 2 assimilation between S and 50% S plants for either species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–791 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance increased with irradiance in C. arabica.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Treatment
irradiance levele0
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stomatal conductance in C. arabica increased with the irradiance level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The conductance increase was less evident than the assimilation increase in C. arabica.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae1
Outcome
Stomatal conductancee1
Direction
less evidente0
Comparator
CO 2 assimilatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase was less evident than that observed for CO 2 assimilation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stomatal conductance in C. arabica increased with the irradiance level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intrinsic water-use efficiency was greater in sunlight and 50% shade than 80% shade.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
S plants and 50% S plantse0
Outcome
intrinsic water use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
80% S plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the CO 2 assimilation/stomatal conductance ratio (A/g), expressing intrinsic water use efficiency, was greater in the S plants and 50% S plants than in the 80% S plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiance did not affect stomatal conductance in C. canephora.

Taxon
C. canephoraCoffea canephorae0
Treatment
Irradiance regimese0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiance regimes did not affect stomatal conductance in C. canephora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1194 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. canephora had a lower A/g ratio than C. arabica under the same irradiance.

Taxon
C. canephoraCoffea canephorae0
Outcome
A/g ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
C. arabicae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. canephora, which had a lower A/g ratio than C. arabica for the same irradiance regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf carbon isotope discrimination was lower in sunlight than 80% shade for both species.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
S plantse0
Outcome
Leaf Δ valuese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
80% S plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf Δ values were lower in S plants than in 80% S plants for both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf carbon isotope discrimination did not differ between sunlight and 50% shade.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
50% S treatmentse0
Outcome
no differencee0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no difference between S and 50% S treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In C. arabica, reduced Δ was associated with a 106% assimilation increase.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
106%e0
Qualifier
decrease in Δe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in Δ was associated with a greater increase in the CO 2 assimilation rate (106%) than in the stomatal conductance (54%) in C. arabica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1555 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In C. arabica, reduced Δ was associated with a 54% conductance increase.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
54%e0
Qualifier
decrease in Δe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in Δ was associated with a greater increase in the CO 2 assimilation rate (106%) than in the stomatal conductance (54%) in C. arabica.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1555 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In C. canephora, reduced Δ was associated with a 73% assimilation increase.

Taxon
C. canephoraCoffea canephorae0
Treatment
irradiance regimee0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
73%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea canephora
Coffea canephora · TaxonKsd5 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In C. canephora the decrease in Δ was associated with an increase in CO 2 assimilation (73%), because stomatal conductance values were not influenced by the irradiance regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1731 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Δ was negatively correlated with instantaneous carbon assimilation.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Outcome
Leaf tissue Δe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = - 0.92e0
Comparator
CO 2 assimilatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf tissue Δ was negatively correlated with instantaneous measurements of CO 2 assimilation (r = - 0.92; P = 0.0109)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1849 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Δ was negatively correlated with stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Outcome
Leaf tissue Δe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = - 0.80e0
Comparator
stomatal conductancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Leaf tissue Δ was negatively correlated with instantaneous measurements of CO 2 assimilation (r = - 0.92; P = 0.0109) and with stomatal conductance (r = - 0.80; P = 0.0570).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-sunlight plants had higher leaf nitrogen than 80% shade plants.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
Full sunlighte0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
80% S plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Full sunlight grown plants exhibited higher leaf nitrogen content than 80% S plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1990 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen increased with irradiance and was strongly correlated with assimilation.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
increasing irradiance levelse0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
r = 0.99e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in leaf nitrogen content with increasing irradiance levels was strongly correlated with CO 2 assimilation rate (r = 0.99, P = 0.0007)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2137 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen increase was negatively correlated with Δ.

Taxon
Coffea speciesCoffeat0
Treatment
increasing irradiance levelse0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
negativelye0
Value
r = - 0.94e0
Comparator
Δe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Coffea species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in leaf nitrogen content with increasing irradiance levels was strongly correlated with CO 2 assimilation rate (r = 0.99, P = 0.0007) and negatively with Δ (r = - 0.94, P = 0.0071).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1991–2185 · show in text ↑