Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Evaluation of two grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) against salinity stress and surveying the effect of Methyl Jasmonate and Epibrassinolide on alleviation the salinity stress

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Salinity is a phenomenon challenging the plantation and growth of grape in arid and semiarid regions. During the present research, tolerance of two grape cultivars(Flame Seedless and Perlette) was evaluated against various sodium chloride salinity levels (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mM) and the effect of Epibrassinolide(EBR)(0, 3 and 6 µM) and Methyle Jasmonate(MeJA)(0, 3 and 6 mM) surveyed at these conditions which was conducted based on factorial experiment in the form of Complete Randomized Desighn(CRD) with four Replications. Based on the obtained results, the cultivar, salinity levels and hormonal treatments were significantly effective on surveyed traits. The results from analysis of variance revealed that increased salinity levels led to significant increase in values of lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leackage(EL), proline content and significant decrease in values of photosynthesis and transpiration rate, relative water content(RWC) and the content of chlorophyll a and b in two varieties. Furthermore EBR and MeJA treatments(specially 6mM MeJA) significantly increased proline content, content of chlorophyll a and b, photosynthesis and transpiration rate and decreased EL and lipid peroxidation in two varieties(except at high salinity stress) and mitigated the adverse effects of NaCl in two cultivars. Withoute salinity application Perlette cultivar produced the best values for physiological and morphological indices. In general, Perlette cultivar proved more tolerance against salinity than Flame Seedless cultivar did.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, salinity level and hormone treatment significantly affected surveyed traits.

Outcome
surveyed traitse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar, salinity levels and hormonal treatments were significantly effective on surveyed traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly raised lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage and proline content in both varieties.

Treatment
increased salinity levelse0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leackage(EL), proline contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased salinity levels led to significant increase in values of lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leackage(EL), proline content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly lowered photosynthesis, transpiration, relative water content and chlorophyll in both varieties.

Outcome
photosynthesis and transpiration rate, relative water content(RWC) and the content of chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significant decrease in values of photosynthesis and transpiration rate, relative water content(RWC) and the content of chlorophyll a and b in two varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR and MeJA significantly increased proline and chlorophyll contents in both varieties except under high salinity.

Treatment
EBR and MeJA treatmentse0
Outcome
proline content, content of chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except at high salinity stresse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“EBR and MeJA treatments(specially 6mM MeJA) significantly increased proline content, content of chlorophyll a and b, photosynthesis and transpiration rate and decreased EL and lipid peroxidation in two varieties(except at high salinity stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR and MeJA significantly increased photosynthesis and transpiration in both varieties except under high salinity.

Treatment
EBR and MeJA treatmentse0
Outcome
photosynthesis and transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“EBR and MeJA treatments(specially 6mM MeJA) significantly increased proline content, content of chlorophyll a and b, photosynthesis and transpiration rate and decreased EL and lipid peroxidation in two varieties(except at high salinity stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EBR and MeJA reduced electrolyte leakage and lipid peroxidation except under high salinity.

Treatment
EBR and MeJA treatmentse0
Outcome
EL and lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“EBR and MeJA treatments(specially 6mM MeJA) significantly increased proline content, content of chlorophyll a and b, photosynthesis and transpiration rate and decreased EL and lipid peroxidation in two varieties(except at high salinity stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without salinity, Perlette had the best physiological and morphological indices.

Material
Perlette cultivare0
Outcome
physiological and morphological indicese0
Qualifier
Withoute salinity applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Withoute salinity application Perlette cultivar produced the best values for physiological and morphological indices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1440 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perlette was more salinity tolerant than Flame Seedless.

Material
Perlette cultivare0
Outcome
tolerance against salinitye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Flame Seedless cultivare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Perlette cultivar proved more tolerance against salinity than Flame Seedless cultivar did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1543 · show in text ↑