Paper · 2003

Reproductive physiology of two wheat cultivars differing in salinity tolerance under dense saline-sodic soil

Mushtaq Ahmad Khan; Zaibunnisa Abdullah

16
claims
128
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We examined the agro-physiological parameters in two wheat cultivars namely, Faisalabad-85 (sensitive to salinity alone) and LU-26-S (tolerant to salinity alone) at reproductive phase grown under dense saline-sodic soil. Our results showed that there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars. CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S, showing nonsignificant effect in Faisalabad-85. Highly significant (P<0.001) increase in Na + and significant ( P<0.01 and P<0.05) reduction in K + concentration was found in flag leaves of both the cultivars. Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85 and 24 % reduction was observed in LU-26-S. Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S, whereas it was reduced significantly (P<0.001) at grain filling stage. In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage but showed significant increase in spikelets and ear stalk (lower) at grainfill stage .Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S showing non-significant effect in Faisalabad-85. More seed numbers/plant and less1000 seed weight was observed in LU-26-S compared to Faisalabad-85 ,where as grain yield was more in later than the former. In present study Faisalabad-85 proved better than LU-26-S under saline sodic soils in terms of mobilization of soluble carbohydrates in different floral parts (especially in spikelets), non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on starch synthase activity in developing grains and 1000 seed weight, thus resulting in higher grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity-sodicity had a nonsignificant effect on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area in both cultivars.

Material
both the cultivarse0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf areae0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO 2 assimilation fell significantly in LU-26-S.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reducede0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO 2 assimilation showed a nonsignificant response in Faisalabad-85.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showing nonsignificant effect in Faisalabad-85.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–486 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf Na + concentration increased significantly in both cultivars.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Na +e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highly significant (P<0.001) increase in Na + and significant ( P<0.01 and P<0.05) reduction in K + concentration was found in flag leaves of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf K + concentration decreased significantly in both cultivars.

Organ / stage
flag leavese0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
K + concentratione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reductione0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highly significant (P<0.001) increase in Na + and significant ( P<0.01 and P<0.05) reduction in K + concentration was found in flag leaves of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability was reduced by 37 % in Faisalabad-85.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Pollen viabilitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reducede0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability was reduced by 24 % in LU-26-S.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Pollen viabilitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reductione0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“24 % reduction was observed in LU-26-S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate mobilization increased significantly in LU-26-S spikelets at anthesis.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Organ / stage
spikeletse0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Carbohydrate mobilizatione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate mobilization decreased significantly in LU-26-S at grain filling.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Carbohydrate mobilizatione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reducede0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas it was reduced significantly (P<0.001) at grain filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faisalabad-85 spikelet and ear stalk carbohydrate concentration was unchanged at anthesis.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Organ / stage
spikelets, ear stalke0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
carbohydrate concentratione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
no changee0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Faisalabad-85 spikelet and lower ear stalk carbohydrate concentration increased significantly at grain filling.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Organ / stage
spikelets and ear stalk (lower)e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
carbohydrate concentratione0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
increasee0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed significant increase in spikelets and ear stalk (lower) at grainfill stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Developing grain starch synthase activity fell significantly in LU-26-S.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Organ / stage
developing grainse0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Gene
Starch synthasee0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Starch synthase activitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
reducede0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Developing grain starch synthase activity had a nonsignificant response in Faisalabad-85.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Treatment
salinity-sodicitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
Starch synthase activitye0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showing non-significant effect in Faisalabad-85.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LU-26-S had more seeds per plant than Faisalabad-85.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
seed numbers/plante0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
Moree0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Comparator
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More seed numbers/plant and less1000 seed weight was observed in LU-26-S compared to Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LU-26-S had lower thousand seed weight than Faisalabad-85.

Material
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
lesse0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Comparator
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More seed numbers/plant and less1000 seed weight was observed in LU-26-S compared to Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faisalabad-85 had higher grain yield than LU-26-S.

Material
Faisalabad-85e0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Outcome
grain yielde0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Direction
moree0e1e2e3e4e5e6
Comparator
LU-26-Se0e1e2e3e4e5e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was more in later than the former.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1474 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was non-significant effect of salinity-sodicity on chlorophyll a and b concentration and leaf area of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–372 · show in text ↑
e2

“CO 2 assimilation was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–437 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pollen viability was reduced 37 % in Faisalabad-85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–699 · show in text ↑
e4

“Carbohydrate mobilization at the time of anthesis showed significant increase (P<0.01) in spikelets of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–854 · show in text ↑
e5

“In Faisalabad-85 no change was observed in carbohydrate concentration of spikelets, ear stalk at anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1038 · show in text ↑
e6

“Starch synthase activity (α−1-4 glucan-glucosyle transferases, EC 2.4.1.21) was reduced significantly (P<0.001) in developing grains of LU-26-S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–46 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 11 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.