Paper · 2015

Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice (DFLJ) - a promising organic signature for tomato cultivation package.

R. Rajamani; Rudresh Kumar Singh; Vinod Kochupillai; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the performance of tomato under organic pot culture containing coco-peat, red soil and cow dung. Three dosage of Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice treatment with Jeevamrit, Humic acid and consortium and one control without Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice supply were compared. A single transplanted plant per pot was raised with manual and natural irrigation in open area. The result showed that the plant performance with respect to biomass components such as number of flowers, fresh shoot and root weight, dry shoot and root weight, shoot length and root volume were significantly influenced by Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice testing. The total plant biomass was higher with Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice , applied at 45 ml/plant along with Jeevamrit 50 ml/plant, consortium 3 gm/plant and Humic acid 5 ml/ plant as compared to other organic input such as Jeevamrit, consortium and Humic acid combination without Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice. Similar trend was noticed with respect to number of flower and root volume; It was significantly higher (20.13and 79.38cm 3 ) with plant treatment receiving dose of 45ml/plant followed by 60 ml/plant (16.67 and 55 cm 3 ) and 75 ml/plant (11.50 and 51.25 cm 3 ). It can be concluded that production of organic tomato with Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice as an organic supplement is a natural, cheap and adaptable for farmers to grow all types of crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf juice significantly influenced tomato biomass and growth traits.

Treatment
Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juicee0
Outcome
fresh shoot and root weight, dry shoot and root weight, shoot lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of flowers, fresh shoot and root weight, dry shoot and root weight, shoot length and root volume were significantly influenced by Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice testing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45 ml/plant juice combination increased total biomass versus organic inputs without juice.

Treatment
Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice , applied at 45 ml/plant along with Jeevamrit 50 ml/plant, consortium 3 gm/plant and Humic acid 5 ml/ plante0
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Jeevamrit, consortium and Humic acid combination without Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total plant biomass was higher with Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice , applied at 45 ml/plant along with Jeevamrit 50 ml/plant, consortium 3 gm/plant and Humic acid 5 ml/ plant as compared to other organic input such as Jeevamrit, consortium and Humic acid combination without Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45ml/plant treatment gave 20.13 flowers, higher than the other doses.

Treatment
45ml/plante0
Outcome
number of flowere0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.13e0
Comparator
60 ml/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of flower and root volume; It was significantly higher (20.13and 79.38cm 3 ) with plant treatment receiving dose of 45ml/plant followed by 60 ml/plant (16.67 and 55 cm 3 ) and 75 ml/plant (11.50 and 51.25 cm 3 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45ml/plant treatment gave 79.38cm 3 root volume, higher than other doses.

Treatment
45ml/plante0
Outcome
root volumee0
Direction
highere0
Value
79.38cm 3e0
Comparator
60 ml/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“number of flower and root volume; It was significantly higher (20.13and 79.38cm 3 ) with plant treatment receiving dose of 45ml/plant followed by 60 ml/plant (16.67 and 55 cm 3 ) and 75 ml/plant (11.50 and 51.25 cm 3 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 ml/plant dose produced 16.67 flowers and 55 cm 3 root volume.

Treatment
60 ml/plante0
Outcome
60 ml/plante0
Value
16.67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“60 ml/plant (16.67 and 55 cm 3 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1216 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75 ml/plant dose produced 11.50 flowers and 51.25 cm 3 root volume.

Treatment
75 ml/plante0
Outcome
75 ml/plante0
Value
11.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“75 ml/plant (11.50 and 51.25 cm 3 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fermented leaf juice as an organic tomato supplement.

Outcome
Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice as an organic supplemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production of organic tomato with Drumstick Fermented Leaf Juice as an organic supplement is a natural, cheap and adaptable for farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1418 · show in text ↑

transgenic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.