processing · Growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
107 claims from these papers; 4 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
4 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 45
Factors influencing infection of the tomato by Verticillium albo‐atrum · 1943
- positive
Tomato Seed Germination. Osmotic Pretreatment and Far Red Inhibition · 1982
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Germination of Osmotically Primed Asparagus and Tomato Seeds after Storage up to Three Months · 1994
- positive
- positive
- no effect
Genetics of Salt and Cold Tolerance in Tomato: Quantitative Analysis and QTL Mapping. · 1999
- positive
Suppressive effects of composts against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on tomato · 2002
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
Effects of Different Strains from Bacterial Manure on Growth of Cucumber and Tomato Seedlings · 2008
- positive
- positive
Laboratory bioassay and greenhouse evaluation of a pine tree substrate used as a container substrate · 2009
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Salt Tolerant Bacteria on the Germination of Tomato Seeds · 2014
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
PARENTAL LINE HAS MORE INFLUENCE ON SEED QUALITY THAN CONDITIONING PROCESS · 2015
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Biofertilizer effect of yeast fermented broth on organic tomato seedlings · 2018
- positive
EFFECTS OF WATER SALINITY AND EGYPTIAN CLOVER AMENDED SUBSTRATES ON TOMATO TRANSPLANT PRODUCTION · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effects of Different Seed Extraction Methods on Seed Quality Parameters in Tomato var pkm.1 · 2022
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- negative
- negative
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 21
- negative
Growing Broomrape (Orobanche spp.) in a Soilless System · 1990
- negative
Non-hydraulic regulation of fruit growth of tomato plants rooted in drying soil. · 2003
- negative
Water Relations, Growth, and Yield of Processing Tomatoes Under Partial Rootzone Drying · 2003
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- no effect
Role of transpiration from fruits in phloem transport and fruit growth in tomato fruits · 2005
- negative
- negative
- negative
Yield and fruit quality in processing tomato under partial rootzone drying · 2006
- negative
- negative
THE EFFECT OF PARTIAL ROOT DRYING ON GROWTH AND IONS CONTENT AND DISTRIBUTION ON TOMATO · 2006
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
Allelopathy of Cucumber Seed during Germination · 2012
- negative
- negative
- negative
Effect of Maize Straw Composite Substrate on Tomato Seedlings Growth · 2021
- no effect
Abscisic Acid Mediates Drought-Enhanced Rhizosheath Formation in Tomato · 2021
- negative
- negative
Effects of Root Temperature and Cluster Position on Fruit Quality of Two Cocktail Tomato Cultivars · 2022
- no effect
Effect of Root-zone Local Cooling on Seedling Growth of Tomato · 2022
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.