Paper · 2022 · Journal of Bio-Environment Control

Effect of Root-zone Local Cooling on Seedling Growth of Tomato

Eun Ji Kim; Hyunseung Hwang; Se Hun Ju; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of root-zone local cooling on seedling growth of tomato was investigated. Lower pipe cooling was used for local cooling of the root zone, and the root zone temperature was set at 20 and 25C. There was no difference in plant height, root length, and leaf number according to local cooling temperature. Leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll content of the shoot and root was higher in the 25C than those of 20C at 28 DAS. These results showed that cooling for seedling growth of tomato 25C is sufficient considering energy efficiency. This study will be helpful in the development of local cooling technology that can reduce the energy required for cooling during the production of tomato seedlings in the high temperature season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seedling height, root length and leaf number did not differ between root-zone cooling temperatures.

Treatment
local cooling temperaturee0
Outcome
plant height, root length, and leaf numbere0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
20 and 25Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in plant height, root length, and leaf number according to local cooling temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the root zone temperature was set at 20 and 25C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 28 DAS, tomato leaf area was higher at 25C than at 20C.

Treatment
25Ce0
Outcome
Leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
28 DASe0
Comparator
20Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll content of the shoot and root was higher in the 25C than those of 20C at 28 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 28 DAS, tomato shoot and root fresh and dry weight were higher at 25C than at 20C.

Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Treatment
25Ce0
Outcome
fresh weight, dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
28 DASe0
Comparator
20Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll content of the shoot and root was higher in the 25C than those of 20C at 28 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 28 DAS, tomato shoot and root chlorophyll content was higher at 25C than at 20C.

Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Treatment
25Ce0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
28 DASe0
Comparator
20Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area, fresh weight, dry weight, and chlorophyll content of the shoot and root was higher in the 25C than those of 20C at 28 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider 25C root-zone cooling sufficient for tomato seedling growth given energy efficiency.

Outcome
25C is sufficiente0
Qualifier
considering energy efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cooling for seedling growth of tomato 25C is sufficient considering energy efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–557 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.