Paper · 2013 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Root-zone Cooling at High Air Temperatures Enhances Physiological Activities and Internal Structures of Roots in Young Tomato Plants

Yasushi Kawasaki; Satoshi Matsuo; Katsumi Suzuki; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Low-cost technology is needed to alleviate high-temperature injury for high-yield greenhouse tomato production. To acquire information about the physiological and morphological effects of root-zone cooling, we grew young tomato plants for 2 weeks in nutrient solution held at about 25°C, considered to be the optimum temperature for tomato plants. We investigated plant growth, nutrient uptake, root activity (xylem exudation and root respiration rate), root indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) concentration, and internal root structure. The root-zone temperature was maintained at 24.7°C by cooling, while the air temperature and control temperatures were higher than optimum (30.8 and 33.7°C, respectively). Root-zone cooling increased the relative growth rate (RGR) of roots compared with the control, followed by shoot RGR. Root IAA was positively correlated with root RGR. Root-zone cooling increased Ca and Mg uptake as well as root xylem exudation and respiration. It also advanced the development of the internal structure of the xylem near the root tip. Thus, possibly by increasing root activity and root IAA, root-zone cooling promoted root growth and nutrient uptake mediated by the development of the root xylem, and thus shoot growth. These results suggest a physiological and morphological mechanism of growth enhancement by root-zone cooling under high air temperature conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling increased the relative growth rate of roots compared with the control in young tomato plants.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Root-zone coolinge1
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR) of rootse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Root-zone cooling increased the relative growth rate (RGR) of roots compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling increased shoot relative growth rate compared with the control, less than root growth.

Treatment
Root-zone coolinge1
Outcome
shoot RGRe1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Root-zone cooling increased the relative growth rate (RGR) of roots compared with the control, followed by shoot RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root IAA concentration was positively correlated with root relative growth rate in tomato.

Compound
IAAe2
Outcome
root RGRe2
Direction
positively correlatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Root IAA was positively correlated with root RGR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling increased Ca and Mg uptake in tomato.

Treatment
Root-zone coolinge3
Outcome
Ca and Mg uptakee3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root-zone cooling increased Ca and Mg uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling increased root xylem exudation and root respiration in tomato.

Treatment
Root-zone coolinge4
Outcome
root xylem exudation and respiratione4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Root-zone cooling increased Ca and Mg uptake as well as root xylem exudation and respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling advanced the development of the internal structure of the xylem near the root tip compared with the control in tomato.

Organ / stage
xyleme1
Treatment
Root-zone coolinge2
Outcome
development of the internal structure of the xylem near the root tipe1
Direction
advancede1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“It also advanced the development of the internal structure of the xylem near the root tip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1053 · show in text ↑
e2

“Root-zone cooling increased the relative growth rate (RGR) of roots compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone cooling possibly promoted root growth and nutrient uptake through increased root activity and root IAA, mediated by root xylem development.

Treatment
root-zone coolinge4
Outcome
root growth and nutrient uptakee4
Qualifier
possibly by increasing root activity and root IAAe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Thus, possibly by increasing root activity and root IAA, root-zone cooling promoted root growth and nutrient uptake mediated by the development of the root xylem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.