Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Washing and/or Cutting Petioles Reduces Nitrate Nitrogen and Potassium Sap Concentrations in Vegetables

Michela Farneselli; Eric H. Simonne; David W. Studstill; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Petiole sap testing using ion-specific electrodes is a simple method that can be used to guide in-season applications of nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) to vegetable crops. This method requires petiole sampling and sap extraction using a sap press. Because some vegetables are grown with foliar applications of N and/or K and because some crops have large petioles, petioles may need to be washed and/or cut before being pressed. Limited information is currently available on the effect of washing/cutting on sap-testing results. Hence, muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles were used to test whether washing/cutting reduced NO3 (nitrate)-N and K concentrations and changed the subsequent interpretation of plant nutritional status. Washing for 30, 60, or 120 sec in distilled water and cutting petioles before or after washing significantly reduced sap concentrations (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 for NO3-N and K, respectively) in seven of 12 tests when compared with the control method (petioles cut and not washed). The average concentration reductions between the control and the lowest value among all the washing/cutting treatments were 30% for NO3-N and 19% for K. These losses due to washing/cutting are likely often to change the diagnosis of nutritional status from “sufficient” to “less than sufficient” and, therefore, may suggest the need for unnecessary fertilizer applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing or cutting petioles significantly reduced sap NO3-N concentration in seven of 12 tests versus cut, unwashed controls.

Taxon
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)e0
Organ / stage
petiolese1
Treatment
Washing for 30, 60, or 120 sec in distilled water and cutting petioles before or after washinge1
Outcome
NO3-Ne1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in seven of 12 testse1
Comparator
control method (petioles cut and not washed)e1

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washing for 30, 60, or 120 sec in distilled water and cutting petioles before or after washing significantly reduced sap concentrations (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 for NO3-N and K, respectively) in seven of 12 tests when compared with the control method (petioles cut and not washed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Washing or cutting petioles significantly reduced sap K concentration in seven of 12 tests versus cut, unwashed controls.

Taxon
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)e0
Organ / stage
petiolese1
Treatment
Washing for 30, 60, or 120 sec in distilled water and cutting petioles before or after washinge1
Outcome
Ke1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in seven of 12 testse1
Comparator
control method (petioles cut and not washed)e1

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“Washing for 30, 60, or 120 sec in distilled water and cutting petioles before or after washing significantly reduced sap concentrations (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 for NO3-N and K, respectively) in seven of 12 tests when compared with the control method (petioles cut and not washed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across treatments, the lowest NO3-N concentration averaged 30% below the control.

Taxon
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)e0
Treatment
washing/cutting treatmentse1
Outcome
NO3-Ne1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
30%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average concentration reductions between the control and the lowest value among all the washing/cutting treatments were 30% for NO3-N and 19% for K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across treatments, the lowest K concentration averaged 19% below the control.

Taxon
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)e0
Treatment
washing/cutting treatmentse1
Outcome
Ke1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
19%e1
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average concentration reductions between the control and the lowest value among all the washing/cutting treatments were 30% for NO3-N and 19% for K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1246 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged that washing and cutting losses may shift a nutritional diagnosis from sufficient to less than sufficient, suggesting unnecessary fertilization.

Taxon
muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)e0
Treatment
washing/cuttinge1
Outcome
diagnosis of nutritional status from “sufficient” to “less than sufficient”e1
Qualifier
may suggest the need for unnecessary fertilizer applicationse1

Verbatim

e0

“muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.), bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“These losses due to washing/cutting are likely often to change the diagnosis of nutritional status from “sufficient” to “less than sufficient” and, therefore, may suggest the need for unnecessary fertilizer applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1467 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

pruning · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

pruning · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.