Paper · 2021 · Heliyon

Physicochemical quality of twin layer solar tunnel dried tomato slices

Lelise Tilahun Dufera; Werner Hofacker; Albert Esper; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of twin layer solar tunnel drying on physicochemical quality of tomato slices. The novelty of this dryer is that it has two layers of trays unlike Hohenheim solar tunnel dryer which makes it to have drying capacity of more than two times compare to type hohenheim solar tunnel dryer with equal collector area. The experiment consists of two (tray position and drying position) factors with two levels of tray position (upper tray (samples exposed to direct solar radiation) and lower tray (samples are exposed to only heated air)) and three levels of drying position (collector out let,middle of the dryer and dryer out let) with three replications. During the experiment 180 kg of Tomato slices of Galilea variety with 5mm thickness were dried in the twin layer solar tunnel dryer. Data on physicochemical quality of tomato were collected and analyzed using SAS (version 9.2). software. From the experimental result; an increase in lycopene and phenolic content retention along the length of the dryer was observed while Vitamin C retention showed a decreasing trend. Large retention of total phenol, lycopene and beta carotene content were observed for the lower tray dried tomato slices compared to the upper tray dried ones. The water activity and PH values of the solar tunnel dried tomatoes were within the safe range from microbial growth, enzymatic and non-enzymatic browning. Compared to sun drying; solar tunnel dried tomatoes showed a much better nutrient retention for all quality parameters which is comparable with the data reported for energy intensive mechanical dryers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene and phenolic content retention increased along the length of the dryer.

Treatment
along the length of the dryere1
Outcome
lycopene and phenolic content retentione1
Direction
increasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in lycopene and phenolic content retention along the length of the dryer was observed while Vitamin C retention showed a decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“twin layer solar tunnel dried tomato slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C retention decreased along the length of the dryer.

Treatment
along the length of the dryere1
Outcome
Vitamin C retentione1
Direction
decreasinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in lycopene and phenolic content retention along the length of the dryer was observed while Vitamin C retention showed a decreasing trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“twin layer solar tunnel dried tomato slices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower tray dried tomato slices retained more total phenol, lycopene and beta carotene than upper tray dried slices.

Taxon
tomato slicese2
Treatment
lower traye2
Outcome
total phenol, lycopene and beta carotene contente2
Direction
Large retentione2
Comparator
upper tray dried onese2

Verbatim

e2

“Large retention of total phenol, lycopene and beta carotene content were observed for the lower tray dried tomato slices compared to the upper tray dried ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water activity and pH of solar tunnel dried tomatoes were within the safe range for microbial growth and browning.

Outcome
water activity and PH valuese3
Qualifier
within the safe rangee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The water activity and PH values of the solar tunnel dried tomatoes were within the safe range from microbial growth, enzymatic and non-enzymatic browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solar tunnel dried tomatoes showed better nutrient retention than sun drying for all quality parameters.

Treatment
solar tunnel driede4
Outcome
nutrient retentione4
Direction
much bettere4
Comparator
sun dryinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“solar tunnel dried tomatoes showed a much better nutrient retention for all quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1571 · show in text ↑
e5

“Compared to sun drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1475 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.