Paper · 2013 · European Journal of Applied Engineering and Scientific Research

Partial root zone drying alternation frequency effect on yield, biomassproduction and fruit quality of tomato crop

N. Affia; A. El Fadla; M. El Otmania; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of the work was to assess the effects of partial rootzone drying (PRD) strategy‘s alternation frequency on some agronomic responses of a tomato crop cultivated in greenhouse and on a sandy substrate. Three treatments were applied: a control and two PRD treatments. The control (T0) received 100% of water requirements while T3 and T4 were irrigated at 50% of water requirements. Those two treatments were alternated at 20% and 40% of dry side water storage depletion, respectively. The control registered the highest yield but the lowest water use efficiency while T4 produced 15% more than T3. Compared to the control, PRD treatment leaf area was decreased and T4 had 27% higher leaf area than T3. Biomass production reached its higher levels for T3 and root biomass accumulation is greater than stem, leaf and fruits. Total soluble solid concentration and acidity of T3 fruits was 25% as higher as T4 and the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control tomato had the highest yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control registered the highest yield but the lowest water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control tomato had the lowest water use efficiency.

Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control registered the highest yield but the lowest water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 yielded 15% more than T3.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
producede0
Direction
moree0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 produced 15% more than T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRD reduced leaf area relative to control.

Treatment
PRD treatmente0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, PRD treatment leaf area was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 had 27% higher leaf area than T3.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
T3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 had 27% higher leaf area than T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest biomass production.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
Biomass productione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass production reached its higher levels for T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass accumulation exceeded stem, leaf and fruit accumulation.

Outcome
root biomass accumulatione0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
stem, leaf and fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root biomass accumulation is greater than stem, leaf and fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 fruit soluble solids were 25% higher than T4 and control.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
Total soluble solid concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
T4 and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble solid concentration and acidity of T3 fruits was 25% as higher as T4 and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 fruit acidity was 25% higher than T4 and control.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
T4 and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble solid concentration and acidity of T3 fruits was 25% as higher as T4 and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–114 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.