Paper · 2025 · Antioxidants

Rose Oil Distillation Wastewater: By-Products of Essential Oil Extraction as Circular Biostimulants for Tomato Growth

Nemanja Živanović; Ivana Danilov; Marija Lesjak; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rose processing into essentials oil is one of the major sectors providing inputs for cosmetics and health/food supplements industry, generating significant amount of wastewater if applying the steam distillation approach. Rose distillation wastewater (RDW), the major by-product of rose processing, still contains a significant load of polyphenolic compounds. This organic burden poses a significant environmental threat for RDW disposal, while, on the other hand, it still contains valuable compounds that could be valorized in the circular economy framework. This study has investigated the possibility of utilizing RDW in various concentrations (10%, 25%, 100% v/v) as a circular tomato growth biostimulant, addressing the existing research gap in the field of circular RDW valorization and its effects on plant growth modulation. LC-MS/MS and antioxidant assays have confirmed a rich antioxidant profile of RDW samples, with gallic acid, quinic acid, quercetin, kaempferol and their glycosides as the most abundant compounds. Tomato germination assays have resulted in significantly improved germination and initial seedling growth parameters when 10% RDW samples PA (‘Pure Aroma’), MA (‘Magic Aroma’) and NA (‘Natural Aroma) had been applied as seed treatment (10 seeds per treatment with each RDW), indicating varying plant growth-promoting potential depending on the RDW chemical composition. The increase in tomato growth parameters compared to the control varied in range 34% (MA)—60% (PA) for root length, 70% (MA)—109% (PA) for shoot length and 43% (MA)—72% (PA) for total seedling length, as well as 43% (MA)—72% (PA) for SVI-I and 40% (NA)—49% (MA) for SVI-II (seedling vigor indices I and II, respectively). Contrarily, the increase in RDW concentration of up to 25% and 100% (v/v) has resulted in inhibition of tomato germination and growth compared to the control (e.g., in range 10–50% (RDW 25%) and 45–87% (RDW 100%) for root length), suggesting the necessity for further optimization of RDW dosage in biostimulant applications. The results of this study open the field of possibilities for further development of circular plant biostimulants based on rose processing by-products, as value-added enrichment of the bio-based solutions portfolio for sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDW contained abundant antioxidant compounds.

Outcome
gallic acid, quinic acid, quercetin, kaempferol and their glycosidese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“RDW samples, with gallic acid, quinic acid, quercetin, kaempferol and their glycosides as the most abundant compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten percent RDW improved tomato germination and initial seedling growth.

Treatment
10% RDW samplese0
Outcome
germination and initial seedling growth parameterse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato germination assays have resulted in significantly improved germination and initial seedling growth parameters when 10% RDW samples PA (‘Pure Aroma’), MA (‘Magic Aroma’) and NA (‘Natural Aroma) had been applied as seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length rose 34% with MA to 60% with PA compared with control.

Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
34% (MA)—60% (PA)e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in tomato growth parameters compared to the control varied in range 34% (MA)—60% (PA) for root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length rose 70% with MA to 109% with PA.

Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70% (MA)—109% (PA)e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in tomato growth parameters compared to the control varied in range 34% (MA)—60% (PA) for root length, 70% (MA)—109% (PA) for shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total seedling length rose 43% with MA to 72% with PA.

Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
total seedling lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
43% (MA)—72% (PA)e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in tomato growth parameters compared to the control varied in range 34% (MA)—60% (PA) for root length, 70% (MA)—109% (PA) for shoot length and 43% (MA)—72% (PA) for total seedling length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SVI-I rose 43% with MA to 72% with PA.

Treatment
MAe0
Outcome
SVI-Ie0
Value
43% (MA)—72% (PA)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“as well as 43% (MA)—72% (PA) for SVI-I and 40% (NA)—49% (MA) for SVI-II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SVI-II rose 40% with NA to 49% with MA.

Treatment
NAe0
Outcome
SVI-IIe0
Value
40% (NA)—49% (MA)e0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“as well as 43% (MA)—72% (PA) for SVI-I and 40% (NA)—49% (MA) for SVI-II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDW at 25% inhibited tomato root growth by 10–50% versus control.

Treatment
RDW 25%e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
10–50%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDW concentration of up to 25% and 100% (v/v) has resulted in inhibition of tomato germination and growth compared to the control (e.g., in range 10–50% (RDW 25%) and 45–87% (RDW 100%) for root length)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDW at 100% inhibited tomato root growth by 45–87% versus control.

Treatment
RDW 100%e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
45–87%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDW concentration of up to 25% and 100% (v/v) has resulted in inhibition of tomato germination and growth compared to the control (e.g., in range 10–50% (RDW 25%) and 45–87% (RDW 100%) for root length)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1951 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.