Paper · 2014

An investigation of allelopathic, genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts

Kabir Usman; Oluwole Emmanuel Taiwo; Omolaja Osoniyi; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the allelopathic, genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of the tuber extracts of Dioscorea dumetorum. This was with a view to eventually identifying herbicides and anti-tumor compounds from the plant. Methanol extract and hexane fraction of pulverized D. dumetorum was obtained. Tests for allelopathy, genotoxicity and cytotoxicity were carried out, along with proline content, total protein and total sugar assays. The hexane fraction exhibited a potent growth inhibitory effect. The inhibition increased from 42% at 15 mg/ml to 92% at 60 mg/ml of the fraction. The methanolic extract was less potent than the hexane fraction, the inhibition increased from 25% at 20 mg/ml to 75% at 80 mg/ml. The extract and fraction also inhibited seed germination in a dose-dependent manner. Genotoxicity studies using Allium cepa showed different chromosomal aberrations like fragmentation, cell with bloated nucleus, fuzzy chromosome, puffy chromosome, chromatin erosion, late condensation and multiple chromatin breaks. The proline content of the onions treated with the extracts increased compared to the control group. There was a significant decrease in protein content in the onions treated with the extracts compared to the control group. Total soluble sugar content increased significantly in the treatment group compared to the control group. The LC50 values obtained in a brine shrimp lethality bioassay of the extracts showed the hexane fraction to be more potent than the methanolic extract. It was 26 µg/ml and 51 µg/ml respectively, which are considerably lower than 1 mg/ml, which is usually considered active. The study showed that the plant possessed allelopathic, genotoxic and cytotoxic potentials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hexane fraction inhibited growth by 42% at 15 mg/ml.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
fractione0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42%e0
Qualifier
15 mg/mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition increased from 42% at 15 mg/ml to 92% at 60 mg/ml of the fraction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hexane fraction inhibited growth by 92% at 60 mg/ml.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
fractione0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
92%e0
Qualifier
60 mg/mle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition increased from 42% at 15 mg/ml to 92% at 60 mg/ml of the fraction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The methanolic extract produced 25% inhibition at 20 mg/ml and was less potent than the hexane fraction.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
methanolic extracte0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
20 mg/mle0
Comparator
hexane fractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The methanolic extract was less potent than the hexane fraction, the inhibition increased from 25% at 20 mg/ml to 75% at 80 mg/ml.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The methanolic extract produced 75% inhibition at 80 mg/ml.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75%e0
Qualifier
80 mg/mle0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibition increased from 25% at 20 mg/ml to 75% at 80 mg/ml.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract inhibited seed germination in a dose-dependent manner.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
dose-dependent mannere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract and fraction also inhibited seed germination in a dose-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fraction inhibited seed germination in a dose-dependent manner.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
fractione0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
dose-dependent mannere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract and fraction also inhibited seed germination in a dose-dependent manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allium cepa exposed to the extracts showed multiple chromosomal abnormalities.

Taxon
Allium cepaAllium cepae0
Outcome
chromosomal aberrations like fragmentation, cell with bloated nucleus, fuzzy chromosome, puffy chromosome, chromatin erosion, late condensation and multiple chromatin breakse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotoxicity studies using Allium cepa showed different chromosomal aberrations like fragmentation, cell with bloated nucleus, fuzzy chromosome, puffy chromosome, chromatin erosion, late condensation and multiple chromatin breaks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onions treated with the extracts had increased proline content relative to controls.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline content of the onions treated with the extracts increased compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Onions treated with the extracts had significantly decreased protein content relative to controls.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant decrease in protein content in the onions treated with the extracts compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble sugar content increased significantly in the treatment group.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae1
Treatment
extractse1
Outcome
Total soluble sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble sugar content increased significantly in the treatment group compared to the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“protein content in the onions treated with the extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1220 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hexane fraction had an LC50 of 26 µg/ml in the brine shrimp assay.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
hexane fractione0
Outcome
LC50 valuese0
Direction
more potente0
Value
26 µg/mle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LC50 values obtained in a brine shrimp lethality bioassay of the extracts showed the hexane fraction to be more potent than the methanolic extract. It was 26 µg/ml and 51 µg/ml respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The methanolic extract had an LC50 of 51 µg/ml in the brine shrimp assay.

Taxon
Dioscorea DumetorumDioscorea dumetorumt0
Treatment
methanolic extracte0
Outcome
LC50 valuese0
Value
51 µg/mle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea dumetorum
Dioscorea dumetorum · TaxonMarco Schmidt · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LC50 values obtained in a brine shrimp lethality bioassay of the extracts showed the hexane fraction to be more potent than the methanolic extract. It was 26 µg/ml and 51 µg/ml respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dioscorea Dumetorum Kunth Tuber extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–109 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

botanical · quality: protein · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.