Paper · 2003 · Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University)

Signal transduction during defense response and source-sink transition in tomato

Markus Hofmann

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Plants have evolved an elaborate system to cope with a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses. Typically, under stress conditions an appropriate defense response is invoked which is accompanied by changes in the metabolic status of the plant. Photosynthesis is downregulated and sucrose is imported into the tissue, which provides a faster and more constant flux of energy and carbon skeletons to perform the defense response. Interestingly, these processes are co-ordinately regulated and the signal transduction chains underlying these cellular programs appear to share at least some common elements. Both the induction of sink metabolism and defense response is dependent on signal transduction pathways involving protein phosphorylation. Furthermore, regulation of extracellular invertase (INV) and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) which are markers for sink metabolism and defense response is preceded by the transient activation of MAP kinases. In depth analysis of MAP kinase activation by partial purification led to the discovery that, depending on the stimulus, different subsets of MAP kinases are activated. This differential MAPK activation is likely to possess a signal encoding function. In addition, the partial purification of MAP kinases was found to be suitable to address specific cellular functions to individual MAP kinase isoenzymes. By this way, LpWIPK was identified as the major MAP kinase activity induced after stimulation of tomato cells with different elicitors. LpWIPK is thus considered as a key regulator of defense response together with sink induction in tomato. A study using nonmetabolisable sucrose analogs revealed that the regulation of photosynthesis is not directly coupled to this signal transduction pathway since it is independent of MAP kinase activation. Nonetheless, downregulation is induced by the same stimuli that induce the defense response and sink metabolism and it will therefore be interesting to uncover the branch points of this signalling network in the future. MAP kinases are not only central components regulating the response to biotic stresses. In addition to e.g. pathogens, MAP kinases are as well involved in signal transduction events invoked by abiotic stresses like cold and drought. In a recent study, we could show that a MAP kinase is activated by heat stress, under conditions a plant will encounter in nature. This previously unknown MAP kinase is able to specifically recognise the heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 as a substrate, which supports a role of this MAP kinase in the regulation of the heat stress response. Moreover, the observation that HsfA3 is phosphorylated by the heat activated MAP kinase in vitro provides a promising basis to identify HsfA3 as the first physiological substrate of a plant MAP kinase. Intracellular protons have been implicated in the signal transduction of defense related signals. In a study using Chenopodium rubrum cells, we could show that cytosolic changes in pH values do not precede the regulation of the marker genes INV and PAL. Depending on the stimulus applied, cytosolic acidification or alkalinisation can be observed, which excludes a role for protons as signals in this pathway. Together with the concomitant changes of the pH value of the extracellular space, these variations can thus be considered as terminal part of the defense response itself rather than as a second messenger. WRKY transcription factors have only recently been identified as indirect targets of a central plant MAP kinase cascade. In addition, the identification of cognate binding sites in the promoters of INV and PAL supports a role for these proteins in the co-ordinate regulation of defense response and sink induction. A novel elicitor responsive WRKY transcription factor, LpWRKY1, was cloned from tomato and characterised with respect to its posttranslational modification. This immediate early transcription factor is transiently induced upon pathogen attack and the induction is dependent on phosphorylation. Furthermore, it was shown for the first time with respect to WRKY transcription factors, that LpWRKY1 is phosphorylated in vivo. Analysis of the role of this phosphorylation by in gel assays using recombinant WRKY protein as the substrate revealed two protein kinases that are transiently activated during the defense response to phosphorylate LpWRKY1. This data demonstrates that WRKY proteins require phosphorylation to modulate their DNA binding or transactivating activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different subsets of MAP kinases are activated depending on the stimulus.

Outcome
different subsets of MAP kinases are activatede1
Qualifier
depending on the stimuluse1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“depending on the stimulus, different subsets of MAP kinases are activated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LpWIPK was identified as the major MAP kinase activity induced after stimulation of tomato cells with different elicitors.

Treatment
different elicitorse1
Gene
LpWIPKe1
Outcome
major MAP kinase activity inducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“LpWIPK was identified as the major MAP kinase activity induced after stimulation of tomato cells with different elicitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1492 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

LpWIPK is considered a key regulator of defense response together with sink induction in tomato.

Gene
LpWIPKe1
Outcome
defense response together with sink inductione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“LpWIPK is thus considered as a key regulator of defense response together with sink induction in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1597 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regulation of photosynthesis is not directly coupled to the MAP kinase signal transduction pathway, since it is independent of MAP kinase activation.

Gene
MAP kinasee1
Outcome
regulation of photosynthesise1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“the regulation of photosynthesis is not directly coupled to this signal transduction pathway since it is independent of MAP kinase activation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1801 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A MAP kinase is activated by heat stress under conditions a plant will encounter in nature.

Treatment
heat stresse1
Gene
a MAP kinasee1
Outcome
activatede1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“we could show that a MAP kinase is activated by heat stress, under conditions a plant will encounter in nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2275–2385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The newly found heat-activated MAP kinase specifically recognises the heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 as a substrate.

Gene
HsfA3e1
Outcome
specifically recognisee1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“This previously unknown MAP kinase is able to specifically recognise the heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 as a substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2387–2513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Chenopodium rubrum cells, cytosolic changes in pH do not precede the regulation of the marker genes INV and PAL.

Taxon
Chenopodium rubrumOxybasis rubrae1
Gene
INV and PALe1
Outcome
cytosolic changes in pH valuese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oxybasis rubra
Oxybasis rubra · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In a study using Chenopodium rubrum cells, we could show that cytosolic changes in pH values do not precede the regulation of the marker genes INV and PAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2903–3057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The elicitor-responsive WRKY transcription factor LpWRKY1 was cloned from tomato.

Gene
LpWRKY1e1
Outcome
clonede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A novel elicitor responsive WRKY transcription factor, LpWRKY1, was cloned from tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3735–3821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LpWRKY1 is transiently induced upon pathogen attack and the induction is dependent on phosphorylation.

Gene
LpWRKY1e0
Outcome
transiently induced upon pathogen attacke1
Qualifier
dependent on phosphorylatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A novel elicitor responsive WRKY transcription factor, LpWRKY1, was cloned from tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3735–3821 · show in text ↑
e1

“This immediate early transcription factor is transiently induced upon pathogen attack and the induction is dependent on phosphorylation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3892–4027 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LpWRKY1 is phosphorylated in vivo, shown for the first time for WRKY transcription factors.

Gene
LpWRKY1e1
Outcome
phosphorylated in vivoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A novel elicitor responsive WRKY transcription factor, LpWRKY1, was cloned from tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3735–3821 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was shown for the first time with respect to WRKY transcription factors, that LpWRKY1 is phosphorylated in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4042–4156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two protein kinases are transiently activated during the defense response to phosphorylate LpWRKY1.

Gene
LpWRKY1e1
Outcome
two protein kinases that are transiently activated during the defense responsee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A novel elicitor responsive WRKY transcription factor, LpWRKY1, was cloned from tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3735–3821 · show in text ↑
e1

“revealed two protein kinases that are transiently activated during the defense response to phosphorylate LpWRKY1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4268–4380 · show in text ↑