Paper · 2010 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

Selection of some suitable drought tolerant wheat genotypes using carbon isotopes discrimination (CID) technique.

Muhammad Ubaidullah Shirazi; Joseph Adu Gyamfi; T. Ram; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was conducted in glass house at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria to select suitable drought tolerant wheat genotype using carbon isotopes discrimination technique. Four wheat genotypes viz., LU-26s, Bhittai, Roshan, Taifu, were tested. There were two treatments. i. Control (normal irrigation) and ii. Drought (@ 30 % field capacity of the control treatment). Drought treatment was imposed after two weeks of germination. The experiment was continued up to 10 weeks after germination and was terminated at flowering stage. The data was recorded in terms of plant height, number of tillers, shoot dry weight and carbon isotopic ratio (δ). Results showed that there was a significant decrease in all the growth parameters. The decrease was also significant among the genotypes. The genotypes LU-26s was found to have best performance under drought condition, with minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight. High corbon isotopes discrimination (CID) values were also observed in genotype LU-26s, showing close positive correlation between SDW and CID. It is therefore concluded that carbon isotopes discrimination can be an important criterion for the selection of wheat genotypes for drought prone areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased the growth parameters of wheat genotypes compared with normal irrigation.

Treatment
Drought (@ 30 % field capacity of the control treatment)e0
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
significant decreasee1
Comparator
Control (normal irrigation)e0
Setting
glass housee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were two treatments. i. Control (normal irrigation) and ii. Drought (@ 30 % field capacity of the control treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–431 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that there was a significant decrease in all the growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–792 · show in text ↑
e6

“conducted in glass house at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) laboratories, Seibersdorf, Austria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The drought-induced decrease in growth was also significant among wheat genotypes.

Outcome
decreasee2
Qualifier
significant among the genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e2

“The decrease was also significant among the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype LU-26s had the best performance under drought, with the smallest decrease in plant height, tiller number and shoot dry weight.

Material
LU-26se3
Outcome
best performance under drought conditione3
Qualifier
minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weighte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e3

“The genotypes LU-26s was found to have best performance under drought condition, with minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1035 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype LU-26s showed high carbon isotope discrimination (CID) values under drought.

Material
LU-26se4
Outcome
corbon isotopes discrimination (CID) valuese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“High corbon isotopes discrimination (CID) values were also observed in genotype LU-26s, showing close positive correlation between SDW and CID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1179 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CID was positively correlated with shoot dry weight in wheat.

Material
LU-26se4
Outcome
correlation between SDW and CIDe4
Direction
close positivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e4

“High corbon isotopes discrimination (CID) values were also observed in genotype LU-26s, showing close positive correlation between SDW and CID”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1179 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that CID can be an important criterion for selecting wheat genotypes for drought-prone areas.

Outcome
selection of wheat genotypes for drought prone arease5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“drought tolerant wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–59 · show in text ↑
e5

“It is therefore concluded that carbon isotopes discrimination can be an important criterion for the selection of wheat genotypes for drought prone areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1333 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.