Paper · 2009 · World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science

Effect of different animal manures on Meloidogyne incognita (kofoid and white) on tomato.

K. Pakeerathan; G. Mikunthan; N. Tharshani

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita are generally regarded as silent enemies in soil and cause losses up to 80% in heavily infested vegetable fields. Stunting, yellowing and a general unthrifty appearance are the symptoms developed above ground slowly over time and remain unnoticed until plants are well developed. Infested tomato wilt or die in hot, dry weather causing losses in yield ranging from 28-68%. A screen house study was conducted to test the effect of different animal manures on the eco-friendly management of M.incognita on tomato. Recommended dosage of manures, biological control agent and chemical nematicide were compared with control. The results revealed that goat manure was the best alternative for the management of M.incognita and more or less equally effective to carbofuran. It is not only suppressing the gall formation but also improve crop growth and biomass production. While bio agent, Tricoderma viride and poultry manure ranked third and fourth, respectively in managing M.incognita. This management study revealed that organic amendments improve the plant growth and check the nematode infestation in vegetable fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure was the best alternative for managing M.incognita and was about as effective as carbofuran.

Treatment
goat manuree0
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
management of M.incognitae0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
carbofurane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“goat manure was the best alternative for the management of M.incognita and more or less equally effective to carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure suppressed gall formation.

Treatment
goat manuree1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
gall formatione0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is not only suppressing the gall formation but also improve crop growth and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“goat manure was the best alternative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Goat manure improved crop growth and biomass production.

Treatment
goat manuree1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
crop growth and biomass productione0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–59 · show in text ↑
e0

“It is not only suppressing the gall formation but also improve crop growth and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“goat manure was the best alternative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tricoderma viride ranked third for managing M.incognita.

Treatment
Tricoderma viridee0
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Second interactor
Tricoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
managing M.incognitae0
Direction
ranked thirde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“bio agent, Tricoderma viride and poultry manure ranked third and fourth, respectively in managing M.incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure ranked fourth for managing M.incognita.

Treatment
poultry manuree0
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
managing M.incognitae0
Direction
fourthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“bio agent, Tricoderma viride and poultry manure ranked third and fourth, respectively in managing M.incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments improved plant growth and checked nematode infestation.

Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth and check the nematode infestatione0
Direction
improvee0
Setting
vegetable fieldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“organic amendments improve the plant growth and check the nematode infestation in vegetable fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1159 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

organic · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.