Paper · 2010 · American-Asian-Journal of agricultural & environmental sciences/American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences

The Effect of Priming on Seed Performance of Canola (Brassica napus L.) Under Drought Stress

Gholam Reza Mohammadi; F. Amiri

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effect of priming on canola seed performance under drought stress a study was carried out at the Seed Research Laboratory of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. The experiment was a factorial with three factors arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications. The first factor was seed priming (control (untreated), KNO and distilled water), the second was drought stress levels (0.0, -0.3, 3 -0.6, -0.9, -1.2 and -1.5 MPa) and the third was canola cultivars (Okapi and Talayeh). Results indicated that for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa. Although, the cultivars showed different responses to the increased drought stress level. For all of the traits under study, the best results due to the priming treatments were obtained at the drought stress levels higher than -0.6 or -0.9 MPa. So that, at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control. However, seeds primed with KNO showed better performance 3 than those primed with distilled water. In general, this study revealed that seed priming especially with KNO3 improved canola seed performance under drought stress condition. However, the improvements were more obvious at the higher levels of drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

germination percentage (GP) declined as drought stress increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa in both canola cultivars.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
germination percentage (GP)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

mean germination rate (MGR) declined as drought stress increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa in both canola cultivars.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
mean germination rate (MGR)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

radicle length (RL) declined as drought stress increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa in both canola cultivars.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
radicle length (RL)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plumule length (PL) declined as drought stress increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa in both canola cultivars.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
plumule length (PL)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seedling dry weight (SDW) declined as drought stress increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa in both canola cultivars.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
seedling dry weight (SDW)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for both cultivars germination percentage (GP), mean germination rate (MGR), radicle length (RL), plumule length (PL) and seedling dry weight (SDW) were reduced when drought stress level were increased from 0 to -1.5 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okapi and Talayeh responded differently to increased drought stress.

Outcome
different responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivars showed different responses to the increased drought stress level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best priming results for all studied traits occurred at drought stress above -0.6 or -0.9 MPa.

Outcome
best resultse0
Qualifier
drought stress levels higher than -0.6 or -0.9 MPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For all of the traits under study, the best results due to the priming treatments were obtained at the drought stress levels higher than -0.6 or -0.9 MPa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO priming improved GP by 128.62 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
GPe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
128.62e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO priming improved MGR by 200 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
MGRe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
200e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO priming improved RL by 223.08 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
RLe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
223.08e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO priming improved PL by 350 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
PLe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
350e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO priming improved SDW by 69.94% versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
SDWe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
69.94%e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water priming improved GP by 21.44 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
GPe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
21.44e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water priming improved MGR by 71.43 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
MGRe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
71.43e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water priming improved RL by 219.23 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
RLe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
219.23e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water priming improved PL by 100 versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
PLe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
100e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Distilled water priming improved SDW by 41.18% versus control at -1.5 MPa.

Treatment
distilled watere0
Outcome
SDWe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
41.18%e0
Qualifier
-1.5 MPae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the -1.5 MPa of drought stress level, GP, MGR, RL, PL and SDW were improved 128.62, 200, 223.08, 350 and 69.94%, respectively by KNO and 21.44, 71.43, 219.23, 100 and 41.18%, respectively 3 by distilled water when compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO primed seeds performed better than distilled-water primed seeds.

Treatment
KNOe0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
distilled watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seeds primed with KNO showed better performance 3 than those primed with distilled water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming, especially with KNO3, improved canola seed performance under drought stress, more obviously at higher stress.

Outcome
canola seed performancee0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming especially with KNO3 improved canola seed performance under drought stress condition. However, the improvements were more obvious at the higher levels of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1583 · show in text ↑