Paper · 2014 · Scientific Papers - Series B, Horticulture

Quality assessment of 'Southland' cultivar peaches according to certain technological factors of culture and storage.

C. Alexe; M. Vintilă; Simona Mariana Popescu; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Because of the great taste attributes, aspect and specifically flavor, plus their importance in nutrition, peaches occupies an important place in consumption in both, fresh and processed condition. Their superior dietary attributes are determined by the content of vitamins, minerals, cellulose, acids and pectin. This paper aimed to present the impact of some production (fertiliser regime) and valorisation (preserving conditions) factors upon the quality and its maintaining capacity during nectarines preserving. The organoleptic appreciation, fruits' firmness, biochemical compose, quantitative and qualitative loses were determinated. The 'Southland' cultivar (created in 1946, America), is very much appreciated all over the world for its great fruits (200-220g) and productivity (30-35 kg/tree). It was provided from the experimental plots of the Research Station for Fruit Growing Constanta, fertilized in different manner, with organic and chemical fertilizers, applied on soil and/or foliar. The peaches were stored at RDIPMHP-Bucharest in three variants: in the ambient temperature (T=26-28 0 C), in cold conditions (T = 2-4°C) and cold + modified atmosphere conditions, during 7, 28 and 35 days, respectively. The best results were obtained in case of the fertilisation with chemical fertilisers applied on soil + foliar, which induces the best quality and maintainance during stored. The results also indicate the superiority of fruit storage in the modified atmosphere comparing with the others methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar chemical fertilizer gave the best fruit quality and maintenance during storage.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicat0
Material
'Southland't0
Treatment
chemical fertilisers applied on soil + foliare0
Outcome
best quality and maintainance during storede0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best results were obtained in case of the fertilisation with chemical fertilisers applied on soil + foliar, which induces the best quality and maintainance during stored.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Southland' cultivar peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified-atmosphere fruit storage was superior to the other storage methods.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicat0
Material
'Southland't0
Treatment
modified atmospheree0
Outcome
superiority of fruit storagee0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
others methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results also indicate the superiority of fruit storage in the modified atmosphere comparing with the others methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“'Southland' cultivar peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–50 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.