application · Quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)

Results agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.

How these papers cite each other

2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19851990199520002005201020152020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 10

  1. Storage Trial of Preliminary Processed Peach · 1981

  2. Physiological analysis for effect of NaHSO3 on peach yield and quality. · 2000

  3. Researches on the influence of technological production and valorization factors on the commercial quality of Cardinal peaches cultivar · 2012

    cited by 1 paper here

  4. Behaviour of delta cultivar nectarines during the valorization process according to the fertilization of the culture. · 2013

    cites 1 paper herecited by 1 paper here

  5. Quality assessment of 'Southland' cultivar peaches according to certain technological factors of culture and storage. · 2014

    cites 1 paper here

  6. Effects of different concentrations of pre-harvest spraying calcium on storage quality of fruits in ‘Huyou' 018 · 2014

  7. Effect of Calcium Treatments on Fruit Quality of Peach‘3-18' · 2015

  8. The Effect of Using Bacterial Manure on the Quality of Peach · 2015

  9. Effect of Foliar Fertilization of Boron, Zinc and Iron on Fruit Quality and Leaf Nutrients Content of Peach cv. Shan-e-Punjab · 2020

  10. Optimizing Biochemical and Phytochemical Attributes in Peaches through Foliar Applications of Silicon and Zinc · 2024

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Prunus persica (peach) against other targets

application · quality: general on other organisms