Quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)

1. calcium atomResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. salicylic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
4. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. DaminozideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. potassium permanganateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. simazineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. storagePositive and negative results23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect
14. fertilizationPositive and negative results13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect
15. irrigationPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
16. co2Positive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. pruningPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. processingPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. trap barrierPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. applicationResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. heatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.