Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad during 2001-2003 to investigate the effect of different N source (urea, calcium ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate) and method of application (broadcast, drilling below seed and side placement) on seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L). Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen source had a non-significant effect on yield and yield components of canola.
- Taxon
- canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napuse0 - Treatment
- N source (urea, calcium ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate)e2
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse1
- Direction
- non-significante1
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e2“different N source (urea, calcium ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate)”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
Claim · model-written summary
Drilling below seed increased canola seed yield by up to 21.10% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- Drilling below seede4
- Outcome
- seed yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 21.10e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Side placement increased canola seed yield by 15.97% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- side placemente4
- Outcome
- seed yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 15.97 %e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drilling below seed increased canola protein by up to 16.45% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- Drilling below seede4
- Outcome
- proteine4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 16.45e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Side placement increased canola protein by 15.93% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- side placemente4
- Outcome
- proteine4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 15.93 %e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Drilling below seed increased canola oil yield by 16.37% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- Drilling below seede4
- Outcome
- oil yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 16.37e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Side placement increased canola oil yield by 11.37% over broadcast application.
- Taxon
- canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
- Treatment
- side placemente4
- Outcome
- oil yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 11.37%e4
- Comparator
- broadcast methode4
- Setting
- Faisalabade3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and quality of canola (Brassica napus L)”
e1“Effect of sources of N on yield and yield components was non-significant where as that of method was significant”
e3“A field experiment was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad”
e4“Drilling below seed and side placement increased seed yield up to 21.10 and 15.97 % and protein up to 16.45 and 15.93 % and oil yield up t016.37 and 11.37% over broadcast method, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
ammonium sulfate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →calcium ammonium nitrate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
transplanting · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →transplanting · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
235 papers more in this group
See all 239 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.