Paper · 2003 · http://abe.ufl.edu/mdukes/pdf/drip/Bell-pepper-on-demand-irrigation.pdf

EFFECT OF SENSOR-BASED HIGH FREQUENCY IRRIGATION ON BELL PEPPER YIELD AND WATER USE

Michael D. Dukes; Eric H. Simonne; David Studstill; et al.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
41
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three levels of sensor based high frequency irrigation treatments and four levels of twice daily irrigation treatments were applied to bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in 2002 to test the effect on yield and seasonal irrigation volume, water use efficiency, and soil moisture content in the root zone. Sensor based treatments used a soil moisture sensor buried 10 cm deep within the crop root zone to maintain soil moisture at a set level. The two sensor based irrigation treatments with the largest seasonal irrigation volume resulted in yields similar to the two largest seasonal volume daily irrigation treatments (marketable yields ranged between 17,000 and 20,000 kg/ha for these treatments), but used approximately 50 % less seasonal irrigation water. This resulted in irrigation water use efficiencies of 1209-2316 kg/ha/m3 for the sensor based treatments while those of daily treatments ranged from 703 to 1612 kg/ha/m3. Sensor based irrigation treatments resulted in significantly higher soil volumetric moisture levels at the 15 and 30 cm depths. The results indicate that high frequency irrigation events based on soil moisture sensor control can maintain crop yields while reducing irrigation water requirements; however, future research is needed to reproduce this first year of results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High volume sensor irrigation maintained yields similar to high volume daily irrigation.

Taxon
bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume0
Treatment
sensor based irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
marketable yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Value
17,000 and 20,000 kg/hae1
Comparator
daily irrigation treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two sensor based irrigation treatments with the largest seasonal irrigation volume resulted in yields similar to the two largest seasonal volume daily irrigation treatments (marketable yields ranged between 17,000 and 20,000 kg/ha for these treatments)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor irrigation used about 50% less seasonal irrigation water.

Taxon
bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume0
Treatment
sensor based irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
seasonal irrigation watere3
Direction
lesse3
Value
50 %e3
Comparator
seasonal volume daily irrigation treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“sensor based irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–482 · show in text ↑
e2

“seasonal volume daily irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–616 · show in text ↑
e3

“used approximately 50 % less seasonal irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor irrigation had water use efficiency of 1209-2316 kg/ha/m3 versus 703 to 1612 kg/ha/m3 for daily treatments.

Taxon
bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume0
Treatment
sensor based treatmentse1
Outcome
irrigation water use efficienciese1
Value
1209-2316 kg/ha/m3e1
Qualifier
703 to 1612 kg/ha/m3e1
Comparator
daily treatmentse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation water use efficiencies of 1209-2316 kg/ha/m3 for the sensor based treatments while those of daily treatments ranged from 703 to 1612 kg/ha/m3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor irrigation significantly raised soil moisture at 15 and 30 cm.

Taxon
bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume0
Treatment
Sensor based irrigation treatmentse1
Outcome
soil volumetric moisture levelse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
15 and 30 cm depthse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–167 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sensor based irrigation treatments resulted in significantly higher soil volumetric moisture levels at the 15 and 30 cm depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1055 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: physics · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.