Paper · 2013

Partitioning of dry matter, Proline accumulation, chloroPhyll content and antioxidant activity of chickPea (CiCer arietinum l.) Plants under chilling stress

Özgür Tatar; Çağlar Özalkan; G. D. Atasoy

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

TaTar, O., C. Ozalkan and G. D. aTasOy, 2013. Partitioning of dry matter, proline accumulation, chlorophyll content and antioxidant activity of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum l.) plants under chilling stress. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci ., 19: 260-265 Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum l.) which is one of the most common legume plants is generally grown as a winter crop in warm regions. Thus, low temperatures, which occur during growing period of the plants, can limit productivity. In the present study, six chickpea cultivars and lines were grown under controlled conditions to understand physiological responses of the plants to chilling stress. The highest total dry matter reduction in chilling conditions was found in genotype HH-2 (43 %) whereas the lowest one in Cevdetbey-98 (25.3 %). This can be due to the differential partitioning of dry matter in both genotypes under chilling conditions. The genotype HH-2 reduces dry matter content of roots and stems and not of leaves whereas the genotype Cevdetbey-98 diminishes the dry matter in leaves, the most cold-sensitive part of plants. after cold exposure, the leaf area in HH-2 was also less decreased than in Cevdetbey-98. Proline content and total antioxidant activity increased whereas total chlo rophyll content decreased in all genotypes during chilling conditions. lower relative increase in proline content of HH-2 and higher in Cevdetbey-98 suggests the possible protective role of proline accumulation in chickpea plants under chilling stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH-2 had a 43% total dry matter reduction in chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HH-2e0
Treatment
chilling conditionse0
Outcome
total dry matter reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
43 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total dry matter reduction in chilling conditions was found in genotype HH-2 (43 %) whereas the lowest one in Cevdetbey-98 (25.3 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cevdetbey-98 had a 25.3% dry matter reduction in chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Cevdetbey-98e0
Treatment
chilling conditionse0
Outcome
total dry matter reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total dry matter reduction in chilling conditions was found in genotype HH-2 (43 %) whereas the lowest one in Cevdetbey-98 (25.3 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH-2 reduced root and stem dry matter under chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HH-2e0
Outcome
dry matter content of roots and stemse0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype HH-2 reduces dry matter content of roots and stems and not of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH-2 did not reduce leaf dry matter.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HH-2e0
Outcome
not of leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype HH-2 reduces dry matter content of roots and stems and not of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cevdetbey-98 diminished leaf dry matter.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Cevdetbey-98e0
Outcome
dry matter in leavese0
Direction
diminishese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype Cevdetbey-98 diminishes the dry matter in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HH-2 leaf area decreased less than Cevdetbey-98 after cold exposure.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HH-2e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
less decreasede0
Comparator
Cevdetbey-98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after cold exposure, the leaf area in HH-2 was also less decreased than in Cevdetbey-98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased in all genotypes during chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
chilling conditionse0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content and total antioxidant activity increased whereas total chlo rophyll content decreased in all genotypes during chilling conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total antioxidant activity increased in all genotypes during chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
chilling conditionse0
Outcome
total antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content and total antioxidant activity increased whereas total chlo rophyll content decreased in all genotypes during chilling conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll content declined in all genotypes during chilling.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
chilling conditionse0
Outcome
total chlo rophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content and total antioxidant activity increased whereas total chlo rophyll content decreased in all genotypes during chilling conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increase was lower in HH-2 and higher in Cevdetbey-98.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
HH-2e0
Outcome
relative increase in proline contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Cevdetbey-98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower relative increase in proline content of HH-2 and higher in Cevdetbey-98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickPea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–106 · show in text ↑

cold · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cold · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 3 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.