Paper · 2010

ROLE OF BRACKISH WATER IN THE RECLAMATION OF SALT AFFECTED SOILS

Munawar Ali; Muhammad Rafiq

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The specific objective of this study was to observe the role of brackish water for reclaiming salt affected land. Experiment was carried out on a saline-sodic, nongypsiferous soil. The treatments tried were: T1) Irrigations with pure tubewell water; T2) T1+Sub-soiling upto 45 cm; T3) T1+Gypsum @ 100% GR of soil; and T4) T1+Pressmud @ 25 tons ha -1 . Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced. Recommended doses of NPK (134 – 56 - 31 kg ha -1 ) was applied. The infiltration rate of the soil increased in all the treatments at the end of the experiment. Maximum increase of 100% was recorded with the application of gypsum @ 100% GR of the soil. The pH of the soil in all the treatments at most of the soil depths increased by 1 to 3 percent at the end of the experiment except at a few soil depths where, it remained static. However, at the end of the experiment the pH ranged between 9.1 to 9.7. The soil ECe decreased in all the treatments at all the soil depths whereas, in treatment 1 and 4, ECe increased by 35 percent and 5 percent only at 60-90 cm soil depth, respectively. The SAR decreased in all the treatments at all the soil depths. In the upper 0-15 cm soil depth the SAR in all the treatments had higher values than the safe limit (13 mmol L -1 ) 1/2 . The maximum wheat grain yield was obtained with the application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil and was followed by T4 (pressmud application @ 25 tons ha -1 ) in both the years. Due to very high salinity/sodicity as well as the continuous application of hazardous water, wheat 2003-04 and rice 2003, 2004 and 2005 could not survive. Application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil with brackish water irrigations proved the best treatment to get the maximum possible yield i.e. 1983 percent more than the irrigations with pure tubewell water application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil infiltration increased in all treatments.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
infiltration rate of the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The infiltration rate of the soil increased in all the treatments at the end of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–550 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum gave the maximum 100% increase in infiltration.

Treatment
application of gypsum @ 100% GR of the soile0
Outcome
infiltration rate of the soile1
Direction
increasee0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum increase of 100% was recorded with the application of gypsum @ 100% GR of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–642 · show in text ↑
e1

“The infiltration rate of the soil increased in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH rose 1 to 3 percent at most depths.

Outcome
pH of the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1 to 3 percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH of the soil in all the treatments at most of the soil depths increased by 1 to 3 percent at the end of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final soil pH ranged from 9.1 to 9.7.

Outcome
pHe0
Value
9.1 to 9.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the end of the experiment the pH ranged between 9.1 to 9.7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil ECe declined across treatments and depths.

Outcome
soil ECee0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil ECe decreased in all the treatments at all the soil depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–963 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60-90 cm depth, ECe increased 35 percent in treatment 1.

Treatment
treatment 1e0
Outcome
ECee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35 percente0
Qualifier
60-90 cm soil depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in treatment 1 and 4, ECe increased by 35 percent and 5 percent only at 60-90 cm soil depth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60-90 cm depth, ECe increased 5 percent in treatment 4.

Treatment
4e0
Outcome
ECee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5 percente0
Qualifier
60-90 cm soil depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in treatment 1 and 4, ECe increased by 35 percent and 5 percent only at 60-90 cm soil depth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SAR declined in all treatments and depths.

Outcome
SARe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The SAR decreased in all the treatments at all the soil depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper-layer SAR stayed above the safe limit.

Outcome
SARe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
13 mmol L -1e0
Comparator
the safe limite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the upper 0-15 cm soil depth the SAR in all the treatments had higher values than the safe limit (13 mmol L -1 ) 1/2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat-rice crop rotation was practiced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum produced the highest wheat grain yield in both years.

Treatment
application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soile0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
T4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum wheat grain yield was obtained with the application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil and was followed by T4 (pressmud application @ 25 tons ha -1 ) in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud ranked second for wheat grain yield in both years.

Treatment
pressmud application @ 25 tons ha -1e0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum wheat grain yield was obtained with the application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil and was followed by T4 (pressmud application @ 25 tons ha -1 ) in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat in 2003-04 failed to survive under high salinity and hazardous irrigation water.

Outcome
could not survivee0
Qualifier
very high salinity/sodicity as well as the continuous application of hazardous watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to very high salinity/sodicity as well as the continuous application of hazardous water, wheat 2003-04 and rice 2003, 2004 and 2005 could not survive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice in 2003, 2004 and 2005 failed to survive under high salinity and hazardous irrigation water.

Outcome
could not survivee0
Qualifier
2003, 2004 and 2005e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to very high salinity/sodicity as well as the continuous application of hazardous water, wheat 2003-04 and rice 2003, 2004 and 2005 could not survive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum with brackish irrigation produced 1983 percent more yield than pure tubewell water.

Treatment
Application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil with brackish water irrigationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
1983 percente0
Comparator
irrigations with pure tubewell water applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil with brackish water irrigations proved the best treatment to get the maximum possible yield i.e. 1983 percent more than the irrigations with pure tubewell water application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1807 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1295 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

lime · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.