Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gypsum with brackish irrigation produced 1983 percent more yield than pure tubewell water.

A claim from ROLE OF BRACKISH WATER IN THE RECLAMATION OF SALT AFFECTED SOILS · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum with brackish irrigation produced 1983 percent more yield than pure tubewell water.

Treatment
Application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil with brackish water irrigationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
1983 percente0
Comparator
irrigations with pure tubewell water applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of gypsum @ 100% GR of soil with brackish water irrigations proved the best treatment to get the maximum possible yield i.e. 1983 percent more than the irrigations with pure tubewell water application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1807
e1

“wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1295

Title

ROLE OF BRACKISH WATER IN THE RECLAMATION OF SALT AFFECTED SOILS

Munawar Ali; Muhammad Rafiq 2010

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-1795adc3083386cb0110459065007c4b2f5ae11fb8bc9a9a5da7cb37230f57ef · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.