Abstract
The effects of spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids on anthocyanins, soluble sugars ,alpha-amylase , Zn and Fe concentration in Brindis Lilium variety , an experiment were carried out as a factorial in the greenhouse in a completely randomized design at tree replication. The concentration of humic and fulvic acid in soaking bulb treatment were Zero, 0.5 and 1 percent and in foliar applications were Zero, 0.50 and 1 per thousand. The results showed that Fulvic and Humic acid have increasing effects on anthocyanin content in lilium flowers. With increasing the amounts of µ-Amylase Enzyme and soluble sugar in lilium the anthocyanin concentration increased too. Soaking bulb method increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentration than spraying method but spraying method was more effective on anthocyanins amounts. The effects of fulvic acid on lilium petals color was more clear with respective to humic acid. With increasing the amounts of humic and fulvic acid, the lilium quality indices increased too but its trend in fulvic acid was more obvious.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Fulvic acid increased anthocyanin content in lilium flowers.
- Material
- Brindise6
- Treatment
- fulvic acidse0
- Outcome
- anthocyanin contente1
- Direction
- increasinge1
- Comparator
- Zeroe7
LiliumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e1“The results showed that Fulvic and Humic acid have increasing effects on anthocyanin content in lilium flowers”
e6“Brindis Lilium variety”
e7“The concentration of humic and fulvic acid in soaking bulb treatment were Zero, 0.5 and 1 percent”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid increased anthocyanin content in lilium flowers.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e1“The results showed that Fulvic and Humic acid have increasing effects on anthocyanin content in lilium flowers”
e6“Brindis Lilium variety”
e7“The concentration of humic and fulvic acid in soaking bulb treatment were Zero, 0.5 and 1 percent”
Claim · model-written summary
Anthocyanin concentration in lilium increased with increasing µ-amylase enzyme activity and soluble sugar.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e2“With increasing the amounts of µ-Amylase Enzyme and soluble sugar in lilium the anthocyanin concentration increased too”
Claim · model-written summary
Soaking bulbs increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-amylase enzyme concentration more than spraying.
- Treatment
- Soaking bulb methode3
- Outcome
- Zn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentratione3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Comparator
- spraying methode3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e3“Soaking bulb method increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentration than spraying method but spraying method was more effective on anthocyanins amounts”
Claim · model-written summary
Spraying was more effective than soaking for increasing anthocyanin amounts in lilium.
- Treatment
- spraying methode3
- Outcome
- anthocyanins amountse3
- Direction
- more effectivee3
- Comparator
- Soaking bulb methode3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e3“Soaking bulb method increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentration than spraying method but spraying method was more effective on anthocyanins amounts”
Claim · model-written summary
Fulvic acid had a clearer effect on lilium petal color than humic acid.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e4“The effects of fulvic acid on lilium petals color was more clear with respective to humic acid”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing humic acid increased lilium quality indices.
- Treatment
- humice5
- Outcome
- lilium quality indicese5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- With increasing the amountse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e5“With increasing the amounts of humic and fulvic acid, the lilium quality indices increased too but its trend in fulvic acid was more obvious”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing fulvic acid increased lilium quality indices, with a more obvious trend than for humic acid.
- Treatment
- fulvice5
- Outcome
- lilium quality indicese5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- its trend in fulvic acid was more obviouse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids”
e5“With increasing the amounts of humic and fulvic acid, the lilium quality indices increased too but its trend in fulvic acid was more obvious”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: phytochemicals · LiliumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · quality: postharvest · LiliumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.