Paper · 2013

Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Yield Attributing Characters in Two Varieties of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Avinash Aney

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seeds of two varieties of Pisum sativum, P. sativum var. hortense (garden pea) and var. arvense (field pea) were subjected to different doses of gamma irradiation to evaluate the effect on yield attributing characters. The effect of mutagen was studied with regard to percent germination, plant height, maturation period, number of branches, and number of flowers per plant, number of pods per plant, pod size, number of seeds per pod and per plant, weight of 100 dried seeds, and number of seeds per 100 grm. Data recorded from the population raised exhibited significant variability in different characters. Most of the physiological parameters viz. percent germination, maturation period and number of flowers showed dose dependent decrease in irradiated plants. Lower doses of gamma irradiation had stimulatory effect on yield attributing parameters such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, and pod size, in both the varieties. P. sativum var. arvense (leafy) was found to be high yielding than var. hortense (leafless) and the genotype of first variety was observed to be more sensitive to gamma irradiation than the latter. Pisum sativum, gamma irradiation, yield, sensitivity, mutagens, genotype

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated pea populations showed significant variability in measured characters.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
variability in different characterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data recorded from the population raised exhibited significant variability in different characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination, maturation period and flower number decreased with irradiation dose.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
irradiated plantse0
Outcome
percent germination, maturation period and number of flowerse0
Direction
dose dependent decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the physiological parameters viz. percent germination, maturation period and number of flowers showed dose dependent decrease in irradiated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irradiation doses stimulated pod number, seed number and pod size in both varieties.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
Lower doses of gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, and pod sizee0
Direction
stimulatorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower doses of gamma irradiation had stimulatory effect on yield attributing parameters such as number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, and pod size, in both the varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pisum sativum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arvense had higher yield than hortense.

Taxon
P. sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Material
P. sativum var. arvensee0
Outcome
high yieldinge0
Direction
high yieldinge0
Comparator
var. hortensee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. sativum var. arvense (leafy) was found to be high yielding than var. hortense (leafless)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arvense was more irradiation sensitive than hortense.

Taxon
P. sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Outcome
more sensitive to gamma irradiatione0
Direction
more sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype of first variety was observed to be more sensitive to gamma irradiation than the latter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“P. sativum var. arvense (leafy)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–983 · show in text ↑

radiation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.