Paper · 1992 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Changes in Tolerance to Partial Desiccation and in Metabolite Content of Celery Somatic Embryos Induced by Reduced Osmotic Potential

Yehoshua Saranga; Y.-H. Kim; Jules Janick

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of reduced osmotic potential on somatic embryos of celery (Apium graveolens L.) were studied in an attempt to understand and improve their tolerance to partial desiccation. Embryos responded similarly to application of high osmoticum (384 mOs/kg H 2 O vs. 190 mOs/kg H 2 O in the control), achieved either by manipulation of sucrose or polyethylene glycol concentrations (PEG). Treatments of high osmotic concentration applied during the last 2 days of the embryo production cycle increased embryo survival and conversion after partial desiccation. The most striking effect of the high osmotic concentrations was the 4-fold increase in proline, while a 2-fold increase was obtained with 1 μ m ABA alone. Application of high osmotica decreased reducing sugars, increased sucrose, but did not affect starch content of embryos; of these responses, only the change in sucrose was similar to that induced by ABA. Osmotic treatments did not affect total fatty acid content in the embryos compared to the 2-fold increase induced by ABA. Chemical name used: abscisic acid (ABA).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose and PEG manipulations produced similar embryo responses at high osmoticum.

Treatment
high osmoticume0
Outcome
responded similarlye0
Value
384 mOs/kg H 2 Oe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Embryos responded similarly to application of high osmoticum (384 mOs/kg H 2 O vs. 190 mOs/kg H 2 O in the control), achieved either by manipulation of sucrose or polyethylene glycol concentrations (PEG).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High osmotic concentration increased embryo survival and conversion after partial desiccation.

Treatment
high osmotic concentratione0
Outcome
embryo survival and conversione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after partial desiccatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of high osmotic concentration applied during the last 2 days of the embryo production cycle increased embryo survival and conversion after partial desiccation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–556 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High osmotic concentration increased embryo proline fourfold.

Treatment
high osmotic concentrationse0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most striking effect of the high osmotic concentrations was the 4-fold increase in proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA alone increased embryo proline twofold.

Treatment
1 μ m ABAe0
Outcome
prolinee1
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 2-fold increase was obtained with 1 μ m ABA alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–711 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–651 · show in text ↑
e2

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic treatments decreased embryo reducing sugars.

Treatment
high osmoticae0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of high osmotica decreased reducing sugars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic treatments increased embryo sucrose.

Treatment
high osmoticae1
Outcome
sucrosee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of high osmotica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic treatments did not affect embryo starch content.

Treatment
high osmoticae1
Outcome
starch content of embryose0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not affect starch content of embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of high osmotica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA induced a similar sucrose change to osmotic treatment.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
change in sucrosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only the change in sucrose was similar to that induced by ABA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–915 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic treatments did not affect embryo total fatty acid content.

Treatment
Osmotic treatmentse0
Outcome
total fatty acid contente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Osmotic treatments did not affect total fatty acid content in the embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA increased embryo total fatty acid content twofold.

Treatment
ABAe0
Outcome
total fatty acid contente1
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Dulce Group
Apium graveolens Dulce Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2-fold increase induced by ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“total fatty acid content in the embryos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–989 · show in text ↑
e2

“celery (Apium graveolens L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–87 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Apium graveolensResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.