Paper · 2010 · Journal of Agricultural Research

Agro-physiological performance of wheat genotypes under moisture stress conditions.

H. M. Akram; Abdus Sattar; Abbas Alı; et al.

14
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during 2004-05 at Agronomic Research Institute AARI, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Screening of 25 wheat genotypes was carried out on the basis of photosynthetic efficiency, plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield per plant under normal soil moisture and moisture stress conditions. In case of normal soil moisture conditions five irrigations were applied at critical growth stages viz. crown root development, tillering, booting, anthesis and milking, whereas in moisture stress treatment no irrigation was applied during whole plant growth and development period and only rainfall of 158.4 mm was the source of moisture supply. The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content. Wheat genotype Blue Silver exhibited comparatively more drought tolerance with less decrease in growth rate (18.70%), total dry matter (22.94%), 1000-grain weight(21.31%) and grain yield (26.50%). Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress decreased plant growth rate.

Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
plant growth ratee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress decreased total dry matter.

Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress decreased 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress decreased grain yield.

Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moisture stress increased chlorophyll content.

Treatment
moisture stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that moisture stress significantly decreased plant growth rate, total dry matter, 1000-grain weight and grain yield; whereas it increased chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver showed less decrease in growth rate under drought, 18.70%.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Outcome
growth ratee0
Direction
less decreasee0
Value
18.70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat genotype Blue Silver exhibited comparatively more drought tolerance with less decrease in growth rate (18.70%), total dry matter (22.94%), 1000-grain weight(21.31%) and grain yield (26.50%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver showed less decrease in total dry matter under drought, 22.94%.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
less decreasee0
Value
22.94%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat genotype Blue Silver exhibited comparatively more drought tolerance with less decrease in growth rate (18.70%), total dry matter (22.94%), 1000-grain weight(21.31%) and grain yield (26.50%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver showed less decrease in 1000-grain weight under drought, 21.31%.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
less decreasee0
Value
21.31%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat genotype Blue Silver exhibited comparatively more drought tolerance with less decrease in growth rate (18.70%), total dry matter (22.94%), 1000-grain weight(21.31%) and grain yield (26.50%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver showed less decrease in grain yield under drought, 26.50%.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
less decreasee0
Value
26.50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat genotype Blue Silver exhibited comparatively more drought tolerance with less decrease in growth rate (18.70%), total dry matter (22.94%), 1000-grain weight(21.31%) and grain yield (26.50%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver had a higher plant growth rate of 1.13 cm/day under moisture stress.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse0
Outcome
plant growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.13 cm/daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver had a higher total dry matter of 39.30 g/plant under moisture stress.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
39.30 g/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver had a higher 1000-grain weight of 48.04g under moisture stress.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.04ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver had a higher grain yield of 14.48g/plant under moisture stress.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.48g/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue Silver had a higher chlorophyll content of 1.46 mg/cm 2 under moisture stress.

Material
Blue Silvere0
Treatment
moisture stress conditionse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.46 mg/cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eventually wheat genotype Blue Silver expressed higher values of plant growth rate (1.13 cm/day), total dry matter (39.30 g/plant), 1000-grain weight (48.04g), grain yield (14.48g/plant) and chlorophyll content (1.46 mg/cm 2 ) under moisture stress conditions followed by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1321 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.