Paper · 2014 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Effect of tillage on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) varieties

John Omondi Okoth; Nancy W. Mungai; J. P. Ouma; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil properties, plant characteristics, agronomic practices and environmental factors often influence biological nitrogen fixation of legumes. Tillage method used in a specific agro-ecological zone is among these factors thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of tillage and no tillage on biological nitrogen fixation and grain yields of three soybean varieties. The study was conducted at four agro-ecological zones of Western Kenya where treatments were replicated thrice using randomized complete block design in split plot arrangement. No tillage and conventional tillage were the main plots whereas, soybean varieties: Nyala, SB19 and SB20 were the sub-plots. Amount of N fixed was determined using 15N abundance method and quantity of nitrogen fixed under no tillage practice exceeded conventional tillage at all sites however, soybean varieties fixed same amount of N. Interaction effect of tillage method and variety on amount of N fixed was varying at every agro-ecological zone though, interaction between no tillage and Nyala fixed more nitrogen at LM 3 than at other agro-ecological zones. Soybean grain yield was similar between tillage methods and also among varieties in a combination of all sites. Practicing no tillage encourages biological nitrogen fixation and its longtime operation leads to yield increase as it improves most soil properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased soybean nitrogen fixation relative to conventional tillage at all sites.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no tillage practicee0
Outcome
quantity of nitrogen fixede0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0
Setting
all sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quantity of nitrogen fixed under no tillage practice exceeded conventional tillage at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean varieties fixed the same amount of nitrogen.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
amount of Ne0
Direction
samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean varieties fixed same amount of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–891 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tillage by variety effect on nitrogen fixation varied among agro-ecological zones.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
tillage methode0
Outcome
amount of N fixede0
Direction
varyinge0
Setting
every agro-ecological zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of tillage method and variety on amount of N fixed was varying at every agro-ecological zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with Nyala fixed more nitrogen at LM 3 than at other zones.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Nyalae0
Treatment
no tillagee0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other agro-ecological zonese0
Setting
LM 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between no tillage and Nyala fixed more nitrogen at LM 3 than at other agro-ecological zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield was similar between tillage methods.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillage methodse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean grain yield was similar between tillage methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1174 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean grain yield was similar among varieties across sites.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Setting
all sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield was similar between tillage methods and also among varieties in a combination of all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that no tillage encourages biological nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no tillagee0
Outcome
biological nitrogen fixatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Practicing no tillage encourages biological nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that long term no tillage increases yield by improving soil properties.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Qualifier
improves most soil propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its longtime operation leads to yield increase as it improves most soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.