Paper · 1992

MUTATION STUDIES IN CHICKPEA (CICERARJETINUM L.) 1. MUTAGEN SENSITIVITY

M. M. Ahsan; Zainal Abidin

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three kabuli chickpea genotypes, viz. ILC's 482, 3279 and 6104 were treated with a range of gamma irradiation doses (10 to 110 kR) and EMS doses (0.1 to 0.4%) to obtain useful information about the use of these mutagens in inducing genetic variability and to estimate the doses of gamma irradiation and EMS that were effective to reduce the growth by a given proportion under control (non-treated) conditions. At lower doses of gamma irradiation, stimulating effect on shoot and root length was observed in all the genotypes but adversely affected at higher doses of gamma irradiation and EMS. The sensitivity to gamma irradiation and EMS appeared to be related with the seed size, The large seeded genotype ILC 6104 seemed to be more sensitive than the small seeded ILC 3279 and ILC 482. It appeared that shoot and root length reduction can be used with equal reliability for estimating the appropriate mutagen dose. Three gamma irradiation doses (40,50 and 60 kR) and two EMS doses (0.1 and 0.2%) which caused reduction in the shoot and root length around 20-40% could be chosen for large scale mutagenic treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower gamma irradiation doses stimulated shoot and root length in all tested chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
lower doses of gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At lower doses of gamma irradiation, stimulating effect on shoot and root length was observed in all the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher gamma irradiation doses adversely affected chickpea shoot and root length.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
higher doses of gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At lower doses of gamma irradiation, stimulating effect on shoot and root length was observed in all the genotypes but adversely affected at higher doses of gamma irradiation and EMS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS adversely affected chickpea shoot and root length.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
EMSe0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At lower doses of gamma irradiation, stimulating effect on shoot and root length was observed in all the genotypes but adversely affected at higher doses of gamma irradiation and EMS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large seeded ILC 6104 appeared more sensitive to gamma irradiation and EMS than ILC 3279 and ILC 482.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC 6104e0
Treatment
gamma irradiation and EMSe0
Outcome
sensitivity to gamma irradiation and EMSe0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
ILC 3279 and ILC 482e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity to gamma irradiation and EMS appeared to be related with the seed size, The large seeded genotype ILC 6104 seemed to be more sensitive than the small seeded ILC 3279 and ILC 482.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot length reduction appeared equally reliable for estimating an appropriate mutagen dose.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Outcome
shoot and root length reductione0
Comparator
equal reliabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It appeared that shoot and root length reduction can be used with equal reliability for estimating the appropriate mutagen dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma irradiation doses of 40,50 and 60 kR caused around 20-40% reduction in chickpea shoot and root length.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40,50 and 60 kRe0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20-40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three gamma irradiation doses (40,50 and 60 kR) and two EMS doses (0.1 and 0.2%) which caused reduction in the shoot and root length around 20-40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS doses of 0.1 and 0.2% caused around 20-40% reduction in chickpea shoot and root length.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Treatment
0.1 and 0.2%e0
Outcome
shoot and root lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20-40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three gamma irradiation doses (40,50 and 60 kR) and two EMS doses (0.1 and 0.2%) which caused reduction in the shoot and root length around 20-40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested 40,50 and 60 kR gamma irradiation doses for large scale chickpea mutagenic treatments.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Outcome
40,50 and 60 kRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three gamma irradiation doses (40,50 and 60 kR) and two EMS doses (0.1 and 0.2%) which caused reduction in the shoot and root length around 20-40% could be chosen for large scale mutagenic treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested 0.1 and 0.2% EMS doses for large scale chickpea mutagenic treatments.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Outcome
0.1 and 0.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three gamma irradiation doses (40,50 and 60 kR) and two EMS doses (0.1 and 0.2%) which caused reduction in the shoot and root length around 20-40% could be chosen for large scale mutagenic treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–28 · show in text ↑

ethyl methanesulfonate · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

radiation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.