Paper · 2012

RADIO-SENSITIVITY OF VARIOUS CHICKPEA GENOTYPES IN M1 GENERATION II-FIELD STUDIES

Tariq Shah; Babar Manzoor Atta; Javed Iqbal Mirza; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of gamma rays and ethylmethane sulphonate (EMS) mutagens on seed germination and plant survival of four chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes including two desi (Pb2000 and C44), one kabuli (Pb-1) and one desi x kabuli introgression genotype (CH40/91) was investigated in the M1 generation under field conditions. Seed germination and plant survival decreased in a linear fashion with the increase in gamma irradiation and EMS doses. EMS dose of 0.4% proved most lethal and reduced the percentage of survived plants in desi genotypes Pb2000 and C44 to 68.3% and 62.7%, respectively. In case of kabuli cultivars Pb-1, gamma irradiation of 300Gy and in CH40/91 EMS dose of 0.2 and 0.3% were most lethal doses and reduced the percentage of survived plants to 67.9, 24.4 and 24.2%, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (P>0.01) among genotypes as well as among different treatment doses regarding plant survival. Highly significant effects of dose x variety interaction for plant survival were observed. From the field experiment, desi type cultivars Pb2000, C44 and kabuli type cultivar Pb-1 appeared to be more radio and EMS resistant whereas CH40/91 was the least radio and EMS resistant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination decreased as gamma irradiation dose increased.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination and plant survival decreased in a linear fashion with the increase in gamma irradiation and EMS doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed germination decreased as EMS dose increased.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
EMS dosese0
Outcome
Seed germinatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination and plant survival decreased in a linear fashion with the increase in gamma irradiation and EMS doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant survival decreased as gamma irradiation dose increased.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination and plant survival decreased in a linear fashion with the increase in gamma irradiation and EMS doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant survival decreased as EMS dose increased.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
EMS dosese0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed germination and plant survival decreased in a linear fashion with the increase in gamma irradiation and EMS doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–446 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.4% EMS, Pb2000 survival fell to 68.3%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Pb2000e0
Treatment
EMS dose of 0.4%e0
Outcome
percentage of survived plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
68.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EMS dose of 0.4% proved most lethal and reduced the percentage of survived plants in desi genotypes Pb2000 and C44 to 68.3% and 62.7%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.4% EMS, C44 survival fell to 62.7%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
C44e0
Treatment
EMS dose of 0.4%e0
Outcome
percentage of survived plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EMS dose of 0.4% proved most lethal and reduced the percentage of survived plants in desi genotypes Pb2000 and C44 to 68.3% and 62.7%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300Gy gamma irradiation, Pb-1 survival fell to 67.9%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Pb-1e0
Treatment
gamma irradiation of 300Gye0
Outcome
percentage of survived plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of kabuli cultivars Pb-1, gamma irradiation of 300Gy and in CH40/91 EMS dose of 0.2 and 0.3% were most lethal doses and reduced the percentage of survived plants to 67.9, 24.4 and 24.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.2% EMS, CH40/91 survival fell to 24.4%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
CH40/91e0
Treatment
EMS dose of 0.2e0
Outcome
percentage of survived plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in CH40/91 EMS dose of 0.2 and 0.3% were most lethal doses and reduced the percentage of survived plants to 67.9, 24.4 and 24.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.3% EMS, CH40/91 survival fell to 24.2%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
CH40/91e0
Treatment
0.3%e0
Outcome
percentage of survived plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in CH40/91 EMS dose of 0.2 and 0.3% were most lethal doses and reduced the percentage of survived plants to 67.9, 24.4 and 24.2%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–804 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed significantly in plant survival.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
plant survivale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (P>0.01) among genotypes as well as among different treatment doses regarding plant survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment doses differed significantly in plant survival.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
plant survivale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (P>0.01) among genotypes as well as among different treatment doses regarding plant survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dose by variety interaction significantly affected plant survival.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
dosee0
Outcome
plant survivale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highly significant effects of dose x variety interaction for plant survival were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1050 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pb2000 and C44 appeared more resistant to radiation and EMS.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Pb2000, C44e0
Outcome
more radio and EMS resistante0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“desi type cultivars Pb2000, C44 and kabuli type cultivar Pb-1 appeared to be more radio and EMS resistant whereas CH40/91 was the least radio and EMS resistant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pb-1 appeared more resistant to radiation and EMS.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Pb-1e0
Outcome
more radio and EMS resistante0
Direction
moree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kabuli type cultivar Pb-1 appeared to be more radio and EMS resistant whereas CH40/91 was the least radio and EMS resistant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CH40/91 appeared least resistant to radiation and EMS.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
CH40/91e0
Outcome
least radio and EMS resistante0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CH40/91 was the least radio and EMS resistant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–154 · show in text ↑

ethyl methanesulfonate · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

radiation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.