Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irradiation at 4.0 kGy greatly reduced mold growth versus controls.

A claim from REDUCTION OF FUNGI AND MYCOTOXINS FORMATION IN SEEDS BY GAMMA‐RADIATION · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation at 4.0 kGy greatly reduced mold growth versus controls.

Taxon
maize, chick‐peas and groundnutArachis hypogaeaCicer arietinumZea mayse1
Treatment
Irradiation at a dose 4.0 kGye0
Outcome
mold growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unirradiated controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation at a dose 4.0 kGy reduced the mold growth greatly relative to unirradiated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–619
e1

“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–64

Title

REDUCTION OF FUNGI AND MYCOTOXINS FORMATION IN SEEDS BY GAMMA‐RADIATION

NAGY H. AZIZ; LOUTFY A.A. MOUSSA; FERIAL M.E. FAR Journal of Food Safety 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4565.2004.tb00379.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e045181154fd83154c5ac38f4951104b76ecf6f5a0f5b4be46c0bdb3249d19eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

radiation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

radiation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

radiation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.