Abstract
ABSTRACT Ninety samples of maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds collected from the Egyptian market were found to be heavily contaminated by molds. Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Eurotium, Fusarium, Mucor, Penicillium and Rhizopus were the most common fungal genera isolated from nondisinfected seeds . Aspergillus alutaceus, A. flavus, Fusarium verticillioides and F. oxysporum were isolated from all surface‐disinfected seeds and were reported to produce ochratoxin A, aflatoxin B 1 and zearalenone, respectively. Irradiation at a dose 4.0 kGy reduced the mold growth greatly relative to unirradiated controls. There was no growth at dose 5.0 kGy. On the basis of the radiation survival data, the decimal reduction values D 10 for A. alutaceus, A. flavus and F. verticilliodies were 0.70. 2.10 and 0.93 kGy in maize. A dose of 5 kGy inhibited the toxigenic molds and mycotoxin formation in seeds. Aflatoxin B 1 and ochratoxin A were detected in maize and chick‐peas, whereas zearalenone was detected in maize samples. Application of radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGy detoxified aflatoxin B 1 by 74.3–76.7%, ochratoxin A by 51.3–96.2% and zearalenone by about 78%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Market seed samples were heavily contaminated by molds.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse0 - Outcome
- heavily contaminated by moldse0
- Setting
- Egyptian markete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“Ninety samples of maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds collected from the Egyptian market were found to be heavily contaminated by molds”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation at 4.0 kGy greatly reduced mold growth versus controls.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- Irradiation at a dose 4.0 kGye0
- Outcome
- mold growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- unirradiated controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“Irradiation at a dose 4.0 kGy reduced the mold growth greatly relative to unirradiated controls”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
There was no mold growth at 5.0 kGy.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- dose 5.0 kGye0
- Outcome
- no growthe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“There was no growth at dose 5.0 kGy”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Five kGy inhibited toxigenic molds and mycotoxin formation in seeds.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- A dose of 5 kGye0
- Outcome
- toxigenic molds and mycotoxin formation in seedse0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“A dose of 5 kGy inhibited the toxigenic molds and mycotoxin formation in seeds”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Six kGy detoxified aflatoxin B 1 by 74.3–76.7%.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGye0
- Outcome
- aflatoxin B 1e0
- Direction
- detoxifiede0
- Value
- 74.3–76.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“Application of radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGy detoxified aflatoxin B 1 by 74.3–76.7%”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Six kGy detoxified ochratoxin A by 51.3–96.2%.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGye0
- Outcome
- ochratoxin Ae0
- Direction
- detoxifiede0
- Value
- 51.3–96.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“Application of radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGy detoxified aflatoxin B 1 by 74.3–76.7%, ochratoxin A by 51.3–96.2% and zearalenone by about 78%”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Six kGy detoxified zearalenone by about 78%.
- Taxon
- maize, chick‐peas and groundnut
Arachis hypogaea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse1 - Treatment
- radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGye0
- Outcome
- zearalenonee0
- Direction
- detoxifiede0
- Value
- about 78%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.



Verbatim
e0“Application of radiation at a dose of 6.0 kGy detoxified aflatoxin B 1 by 74.3–76.7%, ochratoxin A by 51.3–96.2% and zearalenone by about 78%”
e1“maize, chick‐peas and groundnut seeds”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →radiation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
radiation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →radiation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →radiation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →radiation · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.