Paper · 2015 · Research on Crops

Soil moisture content, water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity as influenced by different methods and levels of irrigation in baby corn (Zea maysL.) grown under polyhouse and open field condition

Sadhana R. Babar; S. Bhaskar; Jaywant Arakeri; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to study the effect of different methods and levels of irrigation on soil moisture content, water use efficiency (WUE) and water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions for consecutive two years (kharif 2013 and 2014). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with irrigation methods such as surface and sub-surface drip irrigation under polyhouse and open condition as main plots and scheduling of irrigation based on Epan ratios of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 as sub-plots. Gravimetric soil moisture content recorded at regular intervals varied significantly due to methods of irrigation at two different depths. It was significantly higher in surface method of irrigation at 0–15 cm depth and in sub-surface method of irrigation at 15–30 cm depth. Among levels, irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epan recorded 21 and 20% higher moisture content over 0.6 Epan at 0–15 and 15–30 cm depth, respectively. Green cob and fodder yields were significantly higher in open field condition under sub-surface drip fertigation (12.28 and 58.99 t/ha, respectively) compared to surface drip fertigation. Under polyhouse condition, due to low light availability the yields were significantly less as baby corn being a C4 plant requires high light. The increase in water use efficiency and water productivity for economic yield under open field condition was 15.9 and 16.6% over polyhouse condition, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gravimetric soil moisture content of baby corn plots was significantly higher under the surface method of irrigation at 0–15 cm depth.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
surface method of irrigatione2
Outcome
Gravimetric soil moisture contente1
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
0–15 cm depthe2
Setting
polyhouse and open field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gravimetric soil moisture content recorded at regular intervals varied significantly due to methods of irrigation at two different depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–673 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was significantly higher in surface method of irrigation at 0–15 cm depth and in sub-surface method of irrigation at 15–30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gravimetric soil moisture content of baby corn plots was significantly higher under the sub-surface method of irrigation at 15–30 cm depth.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
sub-surface method of irrigatione2
Outcome
Gravimetric soil moisture contente1
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
15–30 cm depthe2
Setting
polyhouse and open field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gravimetric soil moisture content recorded at regular intervals varied significantly due to methods of irrigation at two different depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–673 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was significantly higher in surface method of irrigation at 0–15 cm depth and in sub-surface method of irrigation at 15–30 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epan gave 21% higher soil moisture content than 0.6 Epan at 0–15 cm depth.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epane1
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
21e1
Qualifier
0–15e1
Comparator
0.6 Epane1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epan recorded 21 and 20% higher moisture content over 0.6 Epan at 0–15 and 15–30 cm depth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epan gave 20% higher soil moisture content than 0.6 Epan at 15–30 cm depth.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epane1
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
highere1
Value
20%e1
Qualifier
15–30 cm depthe1
Comparator
0.6 Epane1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“irrigation scheduled at 1.0 Epan recorded 21 and 20% higher moisture content over 0.6 Epan at 0–15 and 15–30 cm depth, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green cob yield of baby corn was significantly higher in open field under sub-surface drip fertigation (12.28 t/ha) than under surface drip fertigation.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
sub-surface drip fertigatione1
Outcome
Green cobe1
Direction
highere1
Value
12.28e1
Comparator
surface drip fertigatione1
Setting
open field conditione1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green cob and fodder yields were significantly higher in open field condition under sub-surface drip fertigation (12.28 and 58.99 t/ha, respectively) compared to surface drip fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder yield of baby corn was significantly higher in open field under sub-surface drip fertigation (58.99 t/ha) than under surface drip fertigation.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
sub-surface drip fertigatione1
Outcome
fodder yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
58.99 t/hae1
Comparator
surface drip fertigatione1
Setting
open field conditione1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Green cob and fodder yields were significantly higher in open field condition under sub-surface drip fertigation (12.28 and 58.99 t/ha, respectively) compared to surface drip fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Baby corn yields were significantly lower under polyhouse condition because of low light availability, as baby corn is a C4 plant needing high light.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
polyhouse conditione1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lesse1
Qualifier
low light availabilitye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under polyhouse condition, due to low light availability the yields were significantly less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency for economic yield of baby corn was 15.9% higher in open field than under polyhouse.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
open field conditione1
Outcome
water use efficiencye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
15.9e1
Comparator
polyhouse conditione1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in water use efficiency and water productivity for economic yield under open field condition was 15.9 and 16.6% over polyhouse condition, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity for economic yield of baby corn was 16.6% higher in open field than under polyhouse.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
open field conditione1
Outcome
water productivitye1
Direction
increasee1
Value
16.6%e1
Comparator
polyhouse conditione1

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity of baby corn under polyhouse and open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in water use efficiency and water productivity for economic yield under open field condition was 15.9 and 16.6% over polyhouse condition, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1452 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.