Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Chemical weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh

R.K. Tiwari; Imtiaz Khan; Nirmala Singh; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment under on farm trials programme of KVK, was conducted in farmers field during rabi 2005–06 and 2006–07 on wheat (Tricitum aestivum L.) crop cv. GW-273 to evaluate the efficiency of two herbicide 2,4-D and isoproturon and their tank mixture. Phalaris minor among the monocot weeds and Lathyrus aphaca among dicot were the major weeds in the demonstration fields, Post emergence application of 2,4-D 0.75 kg/ha + isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 days after sowing (DAS) gave maximum grain yield (3646 kg/ha) followed by the alone application of isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS with gain yield (3222 kg/ha) and 2, 4-D 0.75 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS (2910 kg/ha). The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon increased the grain yield by 35.4% over control and 19% and 26.8% over individual application of 2,4-D and isoproturon, respectively. The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon also resulted higher weed control efficiency (80.4%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mixture of 2,4-D 0.75 kg/ha + isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha applied post emergence at 25-30 DAS gave the maximum wheat grain yield (3646 kg/ha).

Treatment
Post emergence application of 2,4-D 0.75 kg/ha + isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3646 kg/hae0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post emergence application of 2,4-D 0.75 kg/ha + isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 days after sowing (DAS) gave maximum grain yield (3646 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–521 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha alone at 25-30 DAS gave a grain yield of 3222 kg/ha, next after the mixture.

Treatment
alone application of isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 DASe0
Outcome
gain yielde0
Value
3222 kg/hae0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the alone application of isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS with gain yield (3222 kg/ha) and 2, 4-D 0.75 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS (2910 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D 0.75 kg/ha alone at 25-30 DAS gave a grain yield of 2910 kg/ha, the lowest of the three herbicide treatments.

Treatment
2, 4-D 0.75 kg/ha at 25–30 DASe0
Outcome
gain yielde0
Value
2910 kg/hae0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the alone application of isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS with gain yield (3222 kg/ha) and 2, 4-D 0.75 kg/ha at 25–30 DAS (2910 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,4-D + isoproturon application increased wheat grain yield by 35.4% over the control.

Treatment
application of 2,4-D + isoproturone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35.4%e0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon increased the grain yield by 35.4% over control and 19% and 26.8% over individual application of 2,4-D and isoproturon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,4-D + isoproturon application increased wheat grain yield by 19% over individual application of 2,4-D.

Treatment
application of 2,4-D + isoproturone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0
Comparator
2,4-De0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon increased the grain yield by 35.4% over control and 19% and 26.8% over individual application of 2,4-D and isoproturon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,4-D + isoproturon application increased wheat grain yield by 26.8% over individual application of isoproturon.

Treatment
application of 2,4-D + isoproturone0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.8%e0
Comparator
isoproturone0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon increased the grain yield by 35.4% over control and 19% and 26.8% over individual application of 2,4-D and isoproturon, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2,4-D + isoproturon application resulted in higher weed control efficiency (80.4%).

Treatment
application of 2,4-D + isoproturone0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
80.4%e0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2,4-D + isoproturon also resulted higher weed control efficiency (80.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor among monocot weeds and Lathyrus aphaca among dicot weeds were the major weeds in the demonstration fields.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Second interactor
Lathyrus aphacaLathyrus aphacae0weed
Outcome
the major weedse0
Setting
Rewa district of Madhya Pradesht0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus aphaca
Lathyrus aphaca · Second interactorLeif Stridvall · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phalaris minor among the monocot weeds and Lathyrus aphaca among dicot were the major weeds in the demonstration fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control in wheat through on form demonstrations in Rewa district of Madhya Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–96 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.