Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during winter season to find out the effect of herbicides on weed dynamics and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety LOK-1 in randomized complete block design with three replications under eucalyptus based agroforestry system. An experiment was conducted at the farmer field village- Majitha, District- Jabalpur during the rabi season of 2016-17 and 2017-18. The field was infested with 5 major weed species Phalaris minor, Rumex dentatus (L.), Melilotus indicus (L.), Chenopodium album (L.) and Launaea nudicaulis (L.) during both the year. The hand weeding showed minimum total weed density and dry weight and proved more effective than all weed control treatments and over weedy check. Among chemical weed control treatment 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DAS and 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1, Metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 have control both broad leaf and grassy weed and Clodinafop-propargyl 0.140 kg ha-1 control grassy weed over weedy check. The application of 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 (T5: 77.03 and 80.41%), 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 (T1: 75.15 and 83.00%), and 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DAS (T8: 75.18 and 77.60%) was found higher weed control efficiency during both the year under wheat- Eucalyptus tereticornis based agroforestry system. The hand weeding showed maximum weed control efficiency (T9: 86.73 and 95.51%) and proved superior over herbicidal treatments. The higher grain yield and straw yield was found under hand weeding 30 DAS (T9; 19.75, 18.20 and 46.54, 39.72 q ha-1) during both the year.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Five major weed species infested the field in both years.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- infested with 5 major weed speciese0
- Value
- 5 major weed speciese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The field was infested with 5 major weed species Phalaris minor, Rumex dentatus (L.), Melilotus indicus (L.), Chenopodium album (L.) and Launaea nudicaulis (L.) during both the year”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding minimized weed density and dry weight versus other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- hand weedinge0
- Outcome
- total weed density and dry weighte0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The hand weeding showed minimum total weed density and dry weight and proved more effective than all weed control treatments and over weedy check”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D plus hand weeding controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DASe0
- Outcome
- broad leaf and grassy weede0
- Direction
- controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DAS and 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1, Metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 have control both broad leaf and grassy weed”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D followed by metribuzin controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- broad leaf and grassy weede0
- Direction
- controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1, Metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 have control both broad leaf and grassy weed”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Metribuzin controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- broad leaf and grassy weede0
- Direction
- controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 have control both broad leaf and grassy weed”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop-propargyl controlled grassy weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Clodinafop-propargyl 0.140 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- grassy weede0
- Direction
- controle0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Clodinafop-propargyl 0.140 kg ha-1 control grassy weed over weedy check”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D followed by metribuzin achieved 77.03 and 80.41% weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 77.03 and 80.41%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 fb metribuzin 0.250 Kg ha-1 (T5: 77.03 and 80.41%)”
t0“wheat”
e1“was found higher weed control efficiency during both the year”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D achieved 75.15 and 83.00% weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1e0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 75.15 and 83.00%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 (T1: 75.15 and 83.00%)”
t0“wheat”
e1“was found higher weed control efficiency during both the year”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D plus hand weeding achieved 75.18 and 77.60% weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DASe0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 75.18 and 77.60%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2, 4-D 0.5 lit ha-1 + hand weeding 30 DAS (T8: 75.18 and 77.60%)”
t0“wheat”
e1“was found higher weed control efficiency during both the year”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding had 86.73 and 95.51% weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- hand weedinge0
- Outcome
- weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 86.73 and 95.51%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The hand weeding showed maximum weed control efficiency (T9: 86.73 and 95.51%)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave grain yields of 19.75 and 18.20 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- hand weeding 30 DASe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 19.75, 18.20 and 46.54, 39.72 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher grain yield and straw yield was found under hand weeding 30 DAS (T9; 19.75, 18.20 and 46.54, 39.72 q ha-1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave straw yields of 46.54 and 39.72 q ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- hand weeding 30 DASe0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 46.54, 39.72 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher grain yield and straw yield was found under hand weeding 30 DAS (T9; 19.75, 18.20 and 46.54, 39.72 q ha-1)”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
397 papers more in this group
See all 401 papers →herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
559 papers more in this group
See all 563 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.