Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding minimized weed density and dry weight versus other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- hand weedinge0
- Outcome
- total weed density and dry weighte0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Comparator
- weedy checke0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The hand weeding showed minimum total weed density and dry weight and proved more effective than all weed control treatments and over weedy check”
t0“wheat”
Title
Atul Singh; K.K. Jain; S.D. Upadhyaya International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.301
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Observation Five major weed species infested the field in both years.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D plus hand weeding controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D followed by metribuzin controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Intervention effect Metribuzin controlled broadleaf and grassy weeds.
- Intervention effect Clodinafop-propargyl controlled grassy weeds.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D followed by metribuzin achieved 77.03 and 80.41% weed control efficiency.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D achieved 75.15 and 83.00% weed control efficiency.
- Intervention effect 2,4-D plus hand weeding achieved 75.18 and 77.60% weed control efficiency.
- Intervention effect Hand weeding had 86.73 and 95.51% weed control efficiency.
- Intervention effect Hand weeding gave grain yields of 19.75 and 18.20 q ha-1.
- Intervention effect Hand weeding gave straw yields of 46.54 and 39.72 q ha-1.