Paper · 2001 · The Bryologist

Recovery ofBazzania trilobatafollowing desiccation

Mary C. Sollows; Katherine A. Frego; Christopher Norfolk

14
claims
32
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray, a common and abundant species on the floor of closed canopy mixed and coniferous forests in New Brunswick, were observed to be pale and dry within a 2-yr-old clear-cut area. This multi-part study used a combination of approaches to assess the species' tolerance of various drying regimes. 1) To determine viability of field-dried shoots, bundles of shoots from the clear-cut and from an adjacent closed canopy forest (controls) were compared in terms of color and net photosynthetic rate (using Infra Red Gas Analysis, IRGA) before and after two months of laboratory “recovery” conditions (light, temperature, and humidity similar to those documented in closed canopy forest). Shoot elongation during recovery was also quantified. Field-dried shoots were viable: following recovery period, they had increased in length, shifted in hue, and displayed positive net photosynthesis, however none of these measures of metabolic activity equaled those of the controls. 2) The moisture content at saturation, determined for reference, was 1296.4% by weight. 3) The drying effect of the IRGA process was evaluated by subjecting moist pre-weighed bundles of shoots to three successive sequences of IRGA, re-weighing, and 24 hr of recovery. IRGA resulted in slight (approximately 40%) moisture loss from shoots initially averaging 368.9% moisture (S.E. = 9.96%), but did not cause a significant decrease in net photosynthesis within this range. 4) Tolerance of drying was tested on freshly collected, forest-acclimated moist shoots. Initial net photosynthesis (by IRGA) and moisture content were determined for replicate bundles of shoots. These were then subjected to drying for 1, 2, 4, 7, and 12 d, while control groups were stored at recovery conditions. Net photosynthesis and moisture content were re-measured after drying, and again after 24 hr of recovery. Moisture content of controls declined by approximately 40% during IRGA, and gradually thereafter in recovery conditions; net carbon gain declined over the course of the study. Moisture content of dried shoots declined by an order of magnitude in all treatments, but returned to near control levels after recovery. However, net photosynthesis dropped to zero with drying, and did not resume after rehydration. In view of the sensitivity of B. trilobata to laboratory drying, and its viability on a 2-yr-old clear-cut, we suggest that a) field conditions are neither as severe nor as prolonged as those tested in the laboratory and b) the colonial form prevents inner shoots from uniform exposure to severe conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-dried shoots remained viable and elongated during recovery, but did not attain control activity.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field-dried shoots were viable: following recovery period, they had increased in length, shifted in hue, and displayed positive net photosynthesis, however none of these measures of metabolic activity equaled those of the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-dried shoots shifted hue after recovery but did not match controls.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
huee0
Direction
shiftede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field-dried shoots were viable: following recovery period, they had increased in length, shifted in hue, and displayed positive net photosynthesis, however none of these measures of metabolic activity equaled those of the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field-dried shoots regained positive net photosynthesis after recovery, below controls.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
net photosynthesise0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field-dried shoots were viable: following recovery period, they had increased in length, shifted in hue, and displayed positive net photosynthesis, however none of these measures of metabolic activity equaled those of the controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saturated shoots had moisture content of 1296.4% by weight.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
moisture content at saturatione0
Value
1296.4% by weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The moisture content at saturation, determined for reference, was 1296.4% by weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRGA caused about 40% moisture loss from initially moist shoots.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Treatment
IRGAe0
Outcome
moisture losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
approximately 40%e0
Qualifier
368.9% moisturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IRGA resulted in slight (approximately 40%) moisture loss from shoots initially averaging 368.9% moisture (S.E. = 9.96%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IRGA did not significantly decrease net photosynthesis at the tested moisture range.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae2
Treatment
IRGA processe1
Outcome
net photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not cause a significant decrease in net photosynthesis within this range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“The drying effect of the IRGA process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control shoot moisture declined about 40% during IRGA and then gradually in recovery.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
Moisture contente0
Direction
declinede0
Value
approximately 40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content of controls declined by approximately 40% during IRGA, and gradually thereafter in recovery conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control shoot net carbon gain declined over the study.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
net carbon gaine0
Direction
declinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net carbon gain declined over the course of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2021–2075 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried shoot moisture content fell an order of magnitude across treatments.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae2
Treatment
drying for 1, 2, 4, 7, and 12 de1
Outcome
Moisture contente0
Direction
declinede0
Value
an order of magnitudee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture content of dried shoots declined by an order of magnitude in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2160 · show in text ↑
e1

“subjected to drying for 1, 2, 4, 7, and 12 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1735 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried shoot moisture returned near control levels after recovery.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae2
Outcome
Moisture content of dried shootse1
Direction
returnede0
Comparator
control levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but returned to near control levels after recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2162–2212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moisture content of dried shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2108 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying reduced net photosynthesis to zero.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Treatment
dryinge0
Outcome
net photosynthesise0
Direction
droppede0
Value
zeroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net photosynthesis dropped to zero with drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2269 · show in text ↑
e1

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis did not resume after rehydration.

Taxon
Bazzania trilobataBazzania trilobatae2
Outcome
net photosynthesise1
Direction
did not resumee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not resume after rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2275–2307 · show in text ↑
e1

“net photosynthesis dropped to zero with drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2269 · show in text ↑
e2

“Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest field drying is less severe or prolonged than laboratory drying.

Taxon
B. trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
field conditions are neither as severe nor as prolongede0
Qualifier
those tested in the laboratorye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field conditions are neither as severe nor as prolonged as those tested in the laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2436–2525 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. trilobata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2339–2351 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest colony form shields inner shoots from severe exposure.

Taxon
B. trilobataBazzania trilobatae1
Outcome
prevents inner shoots from uniform exposure to severe conditionse0
Qualifier
colonial forme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bazzania trilobata
Bazzania trilobata · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the colonial form prevents inner shoots from uniform exposure to severe conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2533–2615 · show in text ↑
e1

“B. trilobata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2339–2351 · show in text ↑