Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Crop Management for Increasing Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Northeast China

Xianlong Peng; Yanming Yang; Cailian Yu; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
42
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Poor management is the main reason for high N losses and reduced yield in rice production. Improved crop management in northeastern China is becoming increasingly important due to economic pressures in southern and central China along with rising temperatures in the Northeast, which have led to a major shift in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) production to this region. Here, we examine the opportunities for improving the yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of irrigated rice in northeastern China by optimizing nutrients and increasing the transplanting density. In 2009 to 2011, field experiments were conducted to compare optimized nutrient management (ONM) and optimized crop management treatments (OCM) with the farmers’ crop management (FCM) and no N treatment (control). Compared with the FCM, the ONM and OCM treatments significantly increased average grain yield by respective averages of 9 and 17%. These yield gains resulted from a combination of increases in grains per panicle and panicles per unit area. Compared with the FCM treatment, agronomic efficiency (AE N ), recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen (RE N ) and partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFP N ) were enhanced by an average of 120, 116, and 67% across the ONM and OCM treatments in the 3‐yr study period, respectively. It is clear that high yields combined with high N use efficiency are possible in northeastern China by appropriately increasing rice transplanting density and optimizing nutrient management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized nutrient management increased average rice grain yield by 9% relative to farmer management.

Treatment
ONMe0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9e0
Comparator
FCMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the FCM, the ONM and OCM treatments significantly increased average grain yield by respective averages of 9 and 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized crop management increased average rice grain yield by 17% relative to farmer management.

Treatment
OCMe0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
FCMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the FCM, the ONM and OCM treatments significantly increased average grain yield by respective averages of 9 and 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gains resulted from more grains per panicle and panicles per unit area.

Outcome
grains per panicle and panicles per unit areae0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These yield gains resulted from a combination of increases in grains per panicle and panicles per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ONM and OCM enhanced agronomic N efficiency by an average 120% against FCM.

Treatment
ONM and OCM treatmentse0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency (AE N )e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
120e0
Comparator
FCM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the FCM treatment, agronomic efficiency (AE N ), recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen (RE N ) and partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFP N ) were enhanced by an average of 120, 116, and 67% across the ONM and OCM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ONM and OCM enhanced N recovery efficiency by an average 116% against FCM.

Treatment
ONM and OCM treatmentse0
Outcome
recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen (RE N )e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
116e0
Comparator
FCM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the FCM treatment, agronomic efficiency (AE N ), recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen (RE N ) and partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFP N ) were enhanced by an average of 120, 116, and 67% across the ONM and OCM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ONM and OCM enhanced partial factor productivity of applied N by an average 67% against FCM.

Treatment
ONM and OCM treatmentse0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFP N )e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
67%e0
Comparator
FCM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the FCM treatment, agronomic efficiency (AE N ), recovery efficiency of applied nitrogen (RE N ) and partial factor productivity of applied nitrogen (PFP N ) were enhanced by an average of 120, 116, and 67% across the ONM and OCM treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 31–35 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.