Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during the rainy seasons of 1997 and 1998 to assess the production poten- tial and economics of intercropping of pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br. emend. Stuntz] with pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and castor (Ricinus communis L.) under varying fertility levels. The experiment was conducted in split-plot design with 3 cropping systems (pearlmillet sole, pearlmillet + pigeonpez and pearlmillet + castor) in main plots and 4 sets of fertility levels (control, 40 kg N/ha, 40 kg N + 30 kg P205/ha, 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha) in sub-plots, replicated 4 times. lntercropping had no effect on yield attributes of pearlmillet. Sole pearlmillet gave significantly higher grain yield than pearlmillet intercropped with pigeonpea or castor. Sole - pearlmillet recorded higher N and P uptake than intercropped pearlmillet. The maximum pearlmillet-grain equiva- lent, net returns and benefit : cost ratio were obtained with pearmillet + pigeonpea followed by pearlmillet + castor. Sole pearlmillet recorded the lowest pearlmillet-grain equivalent net returns and benefit : cost ratio. The yield and yield attributes of pearlmillet pearlmillet-grain equivalent, N and P uptake and net returns were higher with higher dose, i.e. 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha. However, the maximum benefit : cost ratio was obtained with 40 kg N + 30 kg P205/ha and 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha (3.5).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping did not affect pearlmillet yield attributes.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- lntercroppinge0
- Outcome
- yield attributes of pearlmillete0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“lntercropping had no effect on yield attributes of pearlmillet.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet had significantly higher grain yield than pearlmillet with pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- Sole pearlmillete0
- Interactor
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- pearlmillet intercropped with pigeonpeae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“Sole pearlmillet gave significantly higher grain yield than pearlmillet intercropped with pigeonpea or castor.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet had significantly higher grain yield than pearlmillet with castor.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- Sole pearlmillete0
- Interactor
- castor
Ricinus communise0other - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- pearlmillet intercropped with pigeonpea or castore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“Sole pearlmillet gave significantly higher grain yield than pearlmillet intercropped with pigeonpea or castor.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet had higher nitrogen and phosphorus uptake than intercropped pearlmillet.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- Sole - pearlmillete0
- Outcome
- N and P uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- intercropped pearlmillete0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“Sole - pearlmillet recorded higher N and P uptake than intercropped pearlmillet.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet with pigeonpea gave the maximum pearlmillet grain equivalent.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- pearmillet + pigeonpeae0
- Interactor
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- pearlmillet-grain equiva- lente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- pearlmillet + castore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“The maximum pearlmillet-grain equiva- lent, net returns and benefit : cost ratio were obtained with pearmillet + pigeonpea followed by pearlmillet + castor.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearlmillet with pigeonpea gave the maximum net returns and benefit to cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- pearmillet + pigeonpeae0
- Interactor
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0other - Outcome
- net returns and benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- pearlmillet + castore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“The maximum pearlmillet-grain equiva- lent, net returns and benefit : cost ratio were obtained with pearmillet + pigeonpea followed by pearlmillet + castor.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pearlmillet gave the lowest grain equivalent, net returns and benefit to cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Outcome
- pearlmillet-grain equivalent net returns and benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“Sole pearlmillet recorded the lowest pearlmillet-grain equivalent net returns and benefit : cost ratio.”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest fertilizer dose increased yield and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/hae0
- Outcome
- yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“The yield and yield attributes of pearlmillet pearlmillet-grain equivalent, N and P uptake and net returns were higher with higher dose, i.e. 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest fertilizer dose increased pearlmillet grain equivalent and net returns.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/hae0
- Outcome
- pearlmillet-grain equivalent, N and P uptake and net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“The yield and yield attributes of pearlmillet pearlmillet-grain equivalent, N and P uptake and net returns were higher with higher dose, i.e. 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Both specified fertilizer doses achieved the maximum benefit to cost ratio of 3.5.
- Taxon
- pearlmillet
Cenchrus americanust0 - Treatment
- 40 kg N + 30 kg P205/ha and 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/hae0
- Outcome
- benefit : cost ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.5e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)”
e0“the maximum benefit : cost ratio was obtained with 40 kg N + 30 kg P205/ha and 80 kg N + 60 kg P205/ha (3.5).”
The same questions in other papers
Cajanus cajan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.