Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Evaluation of intercropping systems involving pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) and mungbean (Vigna radiata) as intercrop in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

N.K. BAROD; SATISH KUMAR; A.K. DHAKA; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out at Hisar during rainy (kharif) and winter (rabi) seasons of 201112 and 2012 13 for evaluation of different intercrops in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Based on the investigation it was found that intercropping systems influenced the number of pods, which was maximum in pigeonpea (90 cm) + mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek] (1:1) (99.30) and number of effective tillers (25.90) and grains/spike (2368) was highest in pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1) in pearlmillet. In case of mungbean, number of pods (44.96) recorded the maximum when mungbean planted one row in pigeonpea at 90 cm. Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively, pearlmillet (2.12 and 8.27 t/ha) respectively, and mungbean (1.36 and 5.41 t/ha) respec- tively. The maximum land-equivalent ratio (LER) (1.56) and land equivalent coefficient (LEC) (0.60) were recorded with pigeonpea (75 cm) + pearlmillet (1:2) during both the years. Pigeonpea planted at 75 cm spacing along with 2 rows of mungbean, resulted maximum pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) (2.63 t/ha) and monetary advantage in- dex (MAI) ( 28,325/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea with one row of mungbean at 90 cm had the maximum pigeonpea pod number, 99.30.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea (90 cm) + mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek] (1:1)e0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
99.30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods, which was maximum in pigeonpea (90 cm) + mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilezek] (1:1) (99.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea and pearlmillet at 90 cm in a 1:1 pattern gave the highest effective tiller number in pearlmillet, 25.90.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1)e0
Outcome
number of effective tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of effective tillers (25.90) and grains/spike (2368) was highest in pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1) in pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same pigeonpea–pearlmillet pattern gave the highest grains per spike in pearlmillet, 2368.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1)e0
Outcome
grains/spikee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2368e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of effective tillers (25.90) and grains/spike (2368) was highest in pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1) in pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean pods were maximal, 44.96, with one row planted in pigeonpea at 90 cm.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
mungbean planted one row in pigeonpea at 90 cme0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
44.96e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of mungbean, number of pods (44.96) recorded the maximum when mungbean planted one row in pigeonpea at 90 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–677 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pigeonpea had the highest grain yield, 2.02 t/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
Graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.02e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pigeonpea had the highest biological yield, 6.02 t/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
biological yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.02 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pearlmillet had the highest grain yield, 2.12 t/ha.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
Graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively, pearlmillet (2.12 and 8.27 t/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pearlmillet had the highest biological yield, 8.27 t/ha.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
biological yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.27 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively, pearlmillet (2.12 and 8.27 t/ha) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole mungbean had the highest grain yield, 1.36 t/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
Graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.36e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively, pearlmillet (2.12 and 8.27 t/ha) respectively, and mungbean (1.36 and 5.41 t/ha) respec- tively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole mungbean had the highest biological yield, 5.41 t/ha.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
sole crope0
Outcome
biological yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.41 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and biological yields were significantly the highest in sole crop i.e. pigeonpea (2.02 and 6.02 t/ha) respectively, pearlmillet (2.12 and 8.27 t/ha) respectively, and mungbean (1.36 and 5.41 t/ha) respec- tively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 75 cm with two pearlmillet rows gave the maximum land-equivalent ratio, 1.56.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea (75 cm) + pearlmillet (1:2)e0
Outcome
land-equivalent ratio (LER)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum land-equivalent ratio (LER) (1.56) and land equivalent coefficient (LEC) (0.60) were recorded with pigeonpea (75 cm) + pearlmillet (1:2) during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same pattern gave the maximum land equivalent coefficient, 0.60.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeonpea (75 cm) + pearlmillet (1:2)e0
Outcome
land equivalent coefficient (LEC)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum land-equivalent ratio (LER) (1.56) and land equivalent coefficient (LEC) (0.60) were recorded with pigeonpea (75 cm) + pearlmillet (1:2) during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea at 75 cm with two mungbean rows maximized pigeonpea equivalent yield at 2.63 t/ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Pigeonpea planted at 75 cm spacing along with 2 rows of mungbeane0
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.63 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeonpea planted at 75 cm spacing along with 2 rows of mungbean, resulted maximum pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) (2.63 t/ha) and monetary advantage in- dex (MAI) ( 28,325/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same pattern maximized monetary advantage index at 28,325/ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Pigeonpea planted at 75 cm spacing along with 2 rows of mungbeane0
Outcome
monetary advantage in- dex (MAI)e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
28,325/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeonpea planted at 75 cm spacing along with 2 rows of mungbean, resulted maximum pigeonpea equivalent yield (PEY) (2.63 t/ha) and monetary advantage in- dex (MAI) ( 28,325/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1247 · show in text ↑

Cajanus cajan · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Vigna radiata · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Cajanus cajan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

60 papers: 47 positive, 13 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 49 positive, 3 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.