Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pigeonpea and pearlmillet at 90 cm in a 1:1 pattern gave the highest effective tiller number in pearlmillet, 25.90.

A claim from Evaluation of intercropping systems involving pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) and mungbean (Vigna radiata) as intercrop in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea and pearlmillet at 90 cm in a 1:1 pattern gave the highest effective tiller number in pearlmillet, 25.90.

Taxon
pearlmilletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1)e0
Outcome
number of effective tillerse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.90e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of effective tillers (25.90) and grains/spike (2368) was highest in pigeonpea 90 cm + pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Emend. Stuntz] (1:1) in pearlmillet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–559

Title

Evaluation of intercropping systems involving pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) and mungbean (Vigna radiata) as intercrop in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)

N.K. BAROD; SATISH KUMAR; A.K. DHAKA; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v62i2.4296

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-dd1fa2e5db268eae3c586aead6b13f11abaafa2c88c8ce15500c94fd02b4d9cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Cajanus cajan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.