Abstract
A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil at Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bijapur (Karnataka) for three rainy seasons from 2009 to 2011 to study the performance of different maturity pigeonpea varieties in pearl millet+pigeonpea (2 : 1) intercropping system. There were 11 treatments consisting of six intercropping treatments of pearl millet+pigeonpea in 2 : 1 row proportion involving two pearl millet genotypes (GHB-558-hybrid and ICMV-221 a composite variety) and three pigeonpea varieties of different maturity viz., Gullal local (short duration), TS-3R (medium duration) and Asha (long duration). In addition, there were five treatments involving two sole crops of pearl millet and three sole crops of pigeonpea. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. Mean results of three years (2009, 2010 and 2011) showed that GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid intercropped with medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R gave significantly higher grain yield (2452 kg/ha) compared to other treatments, however, it was at par with sole crops of GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (2402 kg/ha)and ICMV-221 variety (2293 kg/ha). Pigeonpea grain yield decreased significantly due to pearl millet intercropping irrespective of genotypes. Sole crops of medium duration TS-3R and short duration Gullal local pigeonpea varieties were at par recorded significantly higher grain yields (2301 kg/ha each) compared to sole crop of long duration variety Asha (1765 kg/ha) and other treatments in intercropping system. However, sole crop of long duration Asha pigeonpea variety was at par with medium duration TS-3R pigeonpea variety intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (1577 kg/ha), but it was significantly superior to other pigeonpea genotypes intercropped either with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid or ICMV-221 variety. Pearl millet grain equivalent yield was significantly higher with sole crop of short duration pigeonpea variety Gullal local (9195 kg/ha) compared to other intercropping treatments and sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Asha (6974 kg/ha), however, it was at par with sole crop of medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R (8945 kg/ha) and the same genotype intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (8778 kg/ha). Net return was significantly higher with sole crop of short duration pigeonpea variety Gullal local (Rs. 52694/ha) compared to sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Asha (Rs. 35273/ha) and other pearl millet and pigeonpea intercropping treatments, however, it was at par with sole crop of medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R (Rs.52566/ha) and the same genotype intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (Rs.48545/ha). Benefit : cost ratio followed similar trend. Land equivalent ratio was significantly higher with medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (1.71).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
GHB-558 intercropped with TS-3R gave higher pearl millet grain yield than other treatments, but was at par with sole millet crops.
- Taxon
- pearl millet
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Material
- GHB-558 pearl millet hybride0
- Treatment
- intercropped with medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3Re0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2452 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid intercropped with medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R gave significantly higher grain yield (2452 kg/ha) compared to other treatments, however, it was at par with sole crops of GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (2402 kg/ha)and ICMV-221 variety (2293 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pearl millet intercropping significantly reduced pigeonpea grain yield regardless of genotype.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- pearl millet intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- Pigeonpea grain yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pigeonpea grain yield decreased significantly due to pearl millet intercropping irrespective of genotypes”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole TS-3R pigeonpea had higher grain yield than sole Asha and intercropping treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- TS-3Re0
- Treatment
- Sole cropse0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2301 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- sole crop of long duration variety Ashae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole crops of medium duration TS-3R and short duration Gullal local pigeonpea varieties were at par recorded significantly higher grain yields (2301 kg/ha each) compared to sole crop of long duration variety Asha (1765 kg/ha) and other treatments in intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole Gullal local pigeonpea had higher grain yield than sole Asha and intercropping treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Gullal locale0
- Treatment
- Sole cropse0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2301 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- sole crop of long duration variety Ashae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole crops of medium duration TS-3R and short duration Gullal local pigeonpea varieties were at par recorded significantly higher grain yields (2301 kg/ha each) compared to sole crop of long duration variety Asha (1765 kg/ha) and other treatments in intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole Asha pigeonpea yield was at par with TS-3R intercropped with GHB-558, but exceeded other intercropped pigeonpea genotypes.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Ashae0
- Treatment
- sole crope0
- Outcome
- pigeonpea varietye0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Qualifier
- at par with medium duration TS-3R pigeonpea variety intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (1577 kg/ha)e0
- Comparator
- other pigeonpea genotypes intercropped either with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid or ICMV-221 varietye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sole crop of long duration Asha pigeonpea variety was at par with medium duration TS-3R pigeonpea variety intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (1577 kg/ha), but it was significantly superior to other pigeonpea genotypes intercropped either with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid or ICMV-221 variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole Gullal local had higher pearl millet grain equivalent yield than Asha and intercropping treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Gullal locale0
- Treatment
- sole crope0
- Outcome
- Pearl millet grain equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9195 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Ashae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pearl millet grain equivalent yield was significantly higher with sole crop of short duration pigeonpea variety Gullal local (9195 kg/ha) compared to other intercropping treatments and sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Asha (6974 kg/ha), however, it was at par with sole crop of medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R (8945 kg/ha) and the same genotype intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (8778 kg/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole Gullal local had higher net return than Asha and intercropping treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- Gullal locale0
- Treatment
- sole crope0
- Outcome
- Net returne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 52694/hae0
- Comparator
- sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Ashae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Net return was significantly higher with sole crop of short duration pigeonpea variety Gullal local (Rs. 52694/ha) compared to sole crop of long duration pigeonpea variety Asha (Rs. 35273/ha) and other pearl millet and pigeonpea intercropping treatments, however, it was at par with sole crop of medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R (Rs.52566/ha) and the same genotype intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (Rs.48545/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit to cost ratio followed the net return pattern.
- Taxon
- pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
- Outcome
- Benefit : cost ratioe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benefit : cost ratio followed similar trend”
t0“pearl millet”
Claim · model-written summary
TS-3R with GHB-558 had the highest land equivalent ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Material
- TS-3Re0
- Treatment
- intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybride0
- Outcome
- Land equivalent ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.71e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Land equivalent ratio was significantly higher with medium duration pigeonpea variety TS-3R intercropped with GHB-558 pearl millet hybrid (1.71)”
The same questions in other papers
Cenchrus americanus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Cajanus cajan · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →in vitro · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.