Abstract
Rust caused by Uromyces vicia fabae is an important disease of peas especially in the seed crop and commonly grown varieties viz. Arkel, MattarAgeta 6, Lincoln, Azad Pea 1 and Palam Priya etc. are highly susceptible. Hence, some commercially available fungicides were evaluated for its management. Three foliar sprays of tebuconazole 250 EFW resulted in the least mean rust disease severity (6.2%) followed by propiconazole 25 EC (23.7%) and hexaconazole 5 EC (26.1%) compared with 52.2% in no spray check. The fungicides were effective in controlling powdery mildew and Ascochyta blight also. The least mean powdery mildew severity (0.05%) was recorded in three sprays of propiconazole followed by tebuconazole 250 EWF (2.2%) and hexaconazole 5EC (26.1%). The least Ascochyta development (disease reaction=3.3) was recorded in foursprays of propiconazole and tebuconazole followed by three sprays of tebuconazole (DR=3.7) and four sprays of hexaconazole (DR=4.0). All the fungicides resulted in statistical higher grain yield compared with unsprayed check (8.0 q/ha). The highest yield was recorded in tebuconazole 250 EWF (15.3q/ha) followed by hexaconazole (12.0q/ha) and propiconazole 25 EC (10.9 q/ha) and mancozeb with cost: benefit ratio of 1:12.2, 1:9.3, 1:882, and 1:3.5 respectively. The corresponding cost: benefit for foundation/certified seed was 1:8.1. 1:6.9, 1:6.4, and 1:2.6, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Commonly grown pea varieties were highly susceptible to rust.
- Taxon
- peas
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Interactor
- Uromyces vicia fabaet1pathogen
- Outcome
- highly susceptiblee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Arkel, MattarAgeta 6, Lincoln, Azad Pea 1 and Palam Priya etc. are highly susceptible”
t0“peas”
t1“Uromyces vicia fabae”
Claim · model-written summary
Three tebuconazole sprays gave the lowest rust severity at 6.2%, versus 52.2% without spray.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Three foliar sprays of tebuconazole 250 EFWe0
- Interactor
- Uromyces vicia fabaet1pathogen
- Outcome
- rust disease severitye0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 6.2%e0
- Comparator
- no spray checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three foliar sprays of tebuconazole 250 EFW resulted in the least mean rust disease severity (6.2%) followed by propiconazole 25 EC (23.7%) and hexaconazole 5 EC (26.1%) compared with 52.2% in no spray check”
t0“pea”
t1“Uromyces vicia fabae”
Claim · model-written summary
Propiconazole had 23.7% mean rust severity versus 52.2% without spray.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- propiconazole 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- rust disease severityt1
- Value
- 23.7%e0
- Comparator
- no spray checke0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“propiconazole 25 EC (23.7%) and hexaconazole 5 EC (26.1%) compared with 52.2% in no spray check”
t0“pea”
t1“rust disease severity”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole had 26.1% mean rust severity versus 52.2% without spray.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- hexaconazole 5 ECe0
- Outcome
- rust disease severityt1
- Value
- 26.1%e0
- Comparator
- no spray checke0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hexaconazole 5 EC (26.1%) compared with 52.2% in no spray check”
t0“pea”
t1“rust disease severity”
Claim · model-written summary
Three propiconazole sprays produced the least powdery mildew severity, 0.05%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- three sprays of propiconazolee0
- Outcome
- powdery mildew severitye0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.05%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The least mean powdery mildew severity (0.05%) was recorded in three sprays of propiconazole”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole gave 2.2% mean powdery mildew severity.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- tebuconazole 250 EWFe0
- Outcome
- powdery mildew severityt1
- Value
- 2.2%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tebuconazole 250 EWF (2.2%) and hexaconazole 5EC (26.1%)”
t0“pea”
t1“powdery mildew severity”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole gave 26.1% mean powdery mildew severity.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- hexaconazole 5ECe0
- Outcome
- powdery mildew severityt1
- Value
- 26.1%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hexaconazole 5EC (26.1%)”
t0“pea”
t1“powdery mildew severity”
Claim · model-written summary
Four propiconazole sprays gave the least Ascochyta development, disease reaction 3.3.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- foursprays of propiconazolee0
- Outcome
- Ascochyta developmente0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 3.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The least Ascochyta development (disease reaction=3.3) was recorded in foursprays of propiconazole and tebuconazole”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Four tebuconazole sprays gave the least Ascochyta development, disease reaction 3.3.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- tebuconazolee0
- Outcome
- Ascochyta developmente0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 3.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The least Ascochyta development (disease reaction=3.3) was recorded in foursprays of propiconazole and tebuconazole”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Three tebuconazole sprays had Ascochyta disease reaction 3.7.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- three sprays of tebuconazolee0
- Outcome
- Ascochyta developmentt1
- Value
- 3.7e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“three sprays of tebuconazole (DR=3.7)”
t0“pea”
t1“Ascochyta development”
Claim · model-written summary
Four hexaconazole sprays had Ascochyta disease reaction 4.0.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- four sprays of hexaconazolee0
- Outcome
- Ascochyta developmentt1
- Value
- 4.0e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four sprays of hexaconazole (DR=4.0)”
t0“pea”
t1“Ascochyta development”
Claim · model-written summary
All fungicides significantly increased grain yield relative to an unsprayed check of 8.0 q/ha.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- fungicidese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- 8.0 q/hae0
- Comparator
- unsprayed checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All the fungicides resulted in statistical higher grain yield compared with unsprayed check (8.0 q/ha)”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Tebuconazole had the highest pea grain yield, 15.3q/ha.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- tebuconazole 250 EWFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 15.3q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in tebuconazole 250 EWF (15.3q/ha)”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hexaconazole produced pea grain yield of 12.0q/ha.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- hexaconazolee0
- Outcome
- yieldt1
- Value
- 12.0q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hexaconazole (12.0q/ha)”
t0“pea”
t1“yield was recorded”
Claim · model-written summary
Propiconazole produced pea grain yield of 10.9 q/ha.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- propiconazole 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- yieldt1
- Value
- 10.9 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“propiconazole 25 EC (10.9 q/ha)”
t0“pea”
t1“yield was recorded”
The same questions in other papers
propiconazole · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tebuconazole · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
hexaconazole · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
hexaconazole · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
tebuconazole · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →propiconazole · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tebuconazole · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fungicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.