Abstract
A field experiments was conducted under All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement Project (AICSIP) at 6 lo- cations during the rainy seasons of 2009 and 2010 in a split-plot design having 3 tillage systems in main plots and 4 nutrient-management practices in subplots with 3 replications, to find out their effects on productivity, profitability and energetics of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Conventional tillage resulted in higher grain yield (3.12 t/ha), N, P and K uptake, net returns ( 23.5 103/ha) and output energy (251 103 MJ/ha) than reduced and mini- mum tillage systems. Application of recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizers proved significantly superior in terms of grain yield (3.32 t/ha), net returns ( 26.6 103/ha) and output energy (267 103 MJ/ha) over rest of the treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave grain yield of 3.12 t/ha, higher than reduced and minimum tillage.
- Treatment
- Conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.12 t/hae0
- Comparator
- reduced and mini- mum tillage systemse0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage resulted in higher grain yield (3.12 t/ha), N, P and K uptake, net returns ( 23.5 103/ha) and output energy (251 103 MJ/ha) than reduced and mini- mum tillage systems.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased N, P and K uptake relative to reduced and minimum tillage.
- Treatment
- Conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- reduced and mini- mum tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage resulted in higher grain yield (3.12 t/ha), N, P and K uptake, net returns ( 23.5 103/ha) and output energy (251 103 MJ/ha) than reduced and mini- mum tillage systems.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave net returns of 23.5 103/ha, higher than reduced and minimum tillage.
- Treatment
- Conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 23.5 103/hae0
- Comparator
- reduced and mini- mum tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage resulted in higher grain yield (3.12 t/ha), N, P and K uptake, net returns ( 23.5 103/ha) and output energy (251 103 MJ/ha) than reduced and mini- mum tillage systems.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave output energy of 251 103 MJ/ha, higher than reduced and minimum tillage.
- Treatment
- Conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- output energye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 251 103 MJ/hae0
- Comparator
- reduced and mini- mum tillage systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage resulted in higher grain yield (3.12 t/ha), N, P and K uptake, net returns ( 23.5 103/ha) and output energy (251 103 MJ/ha) than reduced and mini- mum tillage systems.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended inorganic nutrients gave significantly superior grain yield of 3.32 t/ha.
- Treatment
- recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 3.32 t/hae0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizers proved significantly superior in terms of grain yield (3.32 t/ha), net returns ( 26.6 103/ha) and output energy (267 103 MJ/ha) over rest of the treatments.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended inorganic nutrients gave significantly superior net returns of 26.6 103/ha.
- Treatment
- recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 26.6 103/hae0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizers proved significantly superior in terms of grain yield (3.32 t/ha), net returns ( 26.6 103/ha) and output energy (267 103 MJ/ha) over rest of the treatments.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended inorganic nutrients gave significantly superior output energy of 267 103 MJ/ha.
- Treatment
- recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- output energye0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 267 103 MJ/hae0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of recommended dose of nutrients (80: 40: 40 N: P O , K O kg/ha) through inor- 2 5 2 ganic fertilizers proved significantly superior in terms of grain yield (3.32 t/ha), net returns ( 26.6 103/ha) and output energy (267 103 MJ/ha) over rest of the treatments.”
t0“grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ
101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
442 papers more in this group
See all 446 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.