Paper · 2022 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Tillage, sole and intercrop systems and soil amendment influence on sorghum grain and stover nutrient levels

Palé S; SC, Mason; Taonda SJ-B; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) is a major grain crop in Burkina Faso. A three-year experiment was conducted in the Sudanian zone to determine the combined effects of tillage methods (T) and cropping systems with different soil amendments (CS/SA) on plant nutrient concentrations and related this to human and cattle nutrient requirements. The analysis of variance indicated that tillage, soil amendment nor cropping system affected the stover nutrient concentration of grain sorghum. Nitrogen, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn and Cu concentrations in grain were all influenced by the Y x T interaction largely due to increased nutrient concentrations for no-till in 2012 and tied ridges in 2013. As grain yield increased, grain N, Ca, Mg and Mn concentrations decreased while P and Zn increased. Grain N, P, Mg, S, Fe and Zn concentrations met human nutritional requirements, while K, Ca, Mn and Cu were deficient and merited supplementation. Nutrient gross means indicated that cattle nutrient requirements were met for N, P, Mg, Fe and Zn, but low for K, Ca, S, Mn and Cu. Tillage, CS/SA and Y had no or small effects on the nutrient concentrations of sorghum grain and stover. The agroecological zones in 2012 and 2013 indicated most nutrients to be adequate for human and cattle diets, but not for K, Ca, Mn and Cu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage, amendments and cropping system did not affect stover nutrient concentration.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
tillage, soil amendment nor cropping systeme0
Outcome
stover nutrient concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis of variance indicated that tillage, soil amendment nor cropping system affected the stover nutrient concentration of grain sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–489 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year by tillage influenced grain nutrient concentrations, with increases under no till in 2012 and tied ridges in 2013.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
no-till in 2012 and tied ridges in 2013e0
Outcome
concentrations in graine0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn and Cu concentrations in grain were all influenced by the Y x T interaction largely due to increased nutrient concentrations for no-till in 2012 and tied ridges in 2013.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing grain yield was associated with lower grain N, Ca and Mg concentrations.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
grain N, Ca, Mg and Mn concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As grain yield increased, grain N, Ca, Mg and Mn concentrations decreased while P and Zn increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing grain yield was associated with higher grain P and Zn.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
P and Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As grain yield increased, grain N, Ca, Mg and Mn concentrations decreased while P and Zn increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain N, P, Mg, S, Fe and Zn met human nutritional requirements.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Grain N, P, Mg, S, Fe and Zn concentrationse0
Qualifier
human nutritional requirementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain N, P, Mg, S, Fe and Zn concentrations met human nutritional requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain K, Ca, Mn and Cu were deficient for human requirements.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
K, Ca, Mn and Cue0
Direction
deficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while K, Ca, Mn and Cu were deficient and merited supplementation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum means met cattle nutrient requirements for N, P, Mg, Fe and Zn.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
N, P, Mg, Fe and Zne0
Qualifier
cattle nutrient requirementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient gross means indicated that cattle nutrient requirements were met for N, P, Mg, Fe and Zn, but low for K, Ca, S, Mn and Cu.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum means were low for cattle requirements for K, Ca, S, Mn and Cu.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
K, Ca, S, Mn and Cue0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient gross means indicated that cattle nutrient requirements were met for N, P, Mg, Fe and Zn, but low for K, Ca, S, Mn and Cu.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–75 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.