Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Natural Farming Practices Impact on Yield and Macro Nutrient Uptake of Sorghum

S. P. Lalid Kumar; M. R. Latha; P. Janaki; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of the experiment is to study the effect of different natural farming practices on sorghum yield and nutrient uptake. For this a field experiment was carried out in 2023 at the Eastern block - Field No. NA 02, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore. The experiment included a randomized block design with nine treatments and three replications. Zero Budget Natural Farming techniques were fully implemented, encompassing the use of Ghanajeevamirit as a basal application, treating seeds with Beejamirit, applying Jeevamirit every two weeks via irrigation, practicing intercropping and mulching, and employing Whapasa (Alternate Furrow irrigation). Additionally, both organic and integrated plots were integrated into the approach. Results revealed that application of 50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) produced noticeably highest grain yield (2781 kg ha-1), stover yield (5682 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1), which was comparable to T9 ICM using chemical pest repellants. In comparison to natural farming plots, the organic farming plot (T7) showed considerably higher grain yields (2555 kg ha-1), stover yields (5456 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1). There were considerably greater grain yield (2294 kg ha-1), stover yield (5173 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1) in complete Natural Farming plot T2, which include all components (B+J+G+M+I+W) compared to control treatment which had considerably lower grain yield (1597 kg ha-1), stover yield (4306 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake rates (58.28, 15.49 and 27.75 kg ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) gave grain yield of 2781 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2781 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
T9 ICM using chemical pest repellantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) produced noticeably highest grain yield (2781 kg ha-1), stover yield (5682 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparable to T9 ICM using chemical pest repellants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) gave stover yield of 5682 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8)e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5682 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
T9 ICM using chemical pest repellantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) produced noticeably highest grain yield (2781 kg ha-1), stover yield (5682 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparable to T9 ICM using chemical pest repellants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) gave NPK uptake of 135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8)e0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
T9 ICM using chemical pest repellantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 50% organic and 50% inorganic treatments with organic pest repellants as ICM (T8) produced noticeably highest grain yield (2781 kg ha-1), stover yield (5682 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (135.39, 45.09 and 80.49 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“comparable to T9 ICM using chemical pest repellants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

organic farming plot (T7) gave grain yields of 2555 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
organic farming plot (T7)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2555 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
natural farming plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to natural farming plots, the organic farming plot (T7) showed considerably higher grain yields (2555 kg ha-1), stover yields (5456 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

organic farming plot (T7) gave stover yields of 5456 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
organic farming plot (T7)e0
Outcome
stover yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5456 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
natural farming plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to natural farming plots, the organic farming plot (T7) showed considerably higher grain yields (2555 kg ha-1), stover yields (5456 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

organic farming plot (T7) gave NPK uptake of 122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
organic farming plot (T7)e0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
natural farming plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to natural farming plots, the organic farming plot (T7) showed considerably higher grain yields (2555 kg ha-1), stover yields (5456 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (122.49, 39.40, and 66.91 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

complete Natural Farming plot T2 gave grain yield of 2294 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
complete Natural Farming plot T2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
2294 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were considerably greater grain yield (2294 kg ha-1), stover yield (5173 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1) in complete Natural Farming plot T2, which include all components (B+J+G+M+I+W) compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

complete Natural Farming plot T2 gave stover yield of 5173 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
complete Natural Farming plot T2e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
5173 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were considerably greater grain yield (2294 kg ha-1), stover yield (5173 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1) in complete Natural Farming plot T2, which include all components (B+J+G+M+I+W) compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

complete Natural Farming plot T2 gave NPK uptake of 108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
complete Natural Farming plot T2e0
Outcome
NPK uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were considerably greater grain yield (2294 kg ha-1), stover yield (5173 kg ha-1) and NPK uptake (108.32, 34.17, and 56.17 kg ha-1) in complete Natural Farming plot T2, which include all components (B+J+G+M+I+W) compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cultivation system · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.