Abstract
[Objective] To study the effects of mixed substrates of corn cob and sheep manure on growth and development of pea seedlings,so as to provide a scientific basis for developing the soilless culture of peas by using local agricultural organic wastes.[Method] The experiment was conducted with peas as the study objects,five kinds of substrates were prepared by mixing the corn cob and sheep manure at different ratios,the peas cultivated in conventional soil and corn cob were control.[Result] Substrate 1(sheep manure ∶corn cob=1∶5) significantly improved the seedling emergence rate and average leaf area per plant,and increased the plant height,stem diameter and root length;substrate 2(sheep manure∶corn cob=2∶4)significantly improved the plant height and average leaf area per plant,and increased the stem diameter.The leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight and leaf fresh weight of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 1 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob;the stem dry weight,leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight,leaf fresh weight and root-crown ratio of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 2 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob.[Conclusion] The mixed substrates of sheep manure :corn cob(1∶5 and 2∶4) were ideal for culturing pea seedlings.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Substrate 1 significantly improved emergence rate and leaf area.
- Treatment
- Substrate 1(sheep manure ∶corn cob=1∶5)e0
- Outcome
- seedling emergence rate and average leaf area per plante0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Substrate 1(sheep manure ∶corn cob=1∶5) significantly improved the seedling emergence rate and average leaf area per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Substrate 1 increased plant height, stem diameter and root length.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“increased the plant height,stem diameter and root length”
Claim · model-written summary
Substrate 2 significantly improved plant height and leaf area.
- Treatment
- substrate 2(sheep manure∶corn cob=2∶4)e0
- Outcome
- plant height and average leaf area per plante0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“substrate 2(sheep manure∶corn cob=2∶4)significantly improved the plant height and average leaf area per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Substrate 2 increased stem diameter.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“substrate 2(sheep manure∶corn cob=2∶4)significantly improved the plant height and average leaf area per plant,and increased the stem diameter”
Claim · model-written summary
Formula 1 increased seedling leaf dry weight and root fresh weight over soil and corn cob.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- formula 1e0
- Outcome
- leaf dry weight,root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- soil and corn cobe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight and leaf fresh weight of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 1 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob”
Claim · model-written summary
Formula 1 increased stem and leaf fresh weights over soil and corn cob.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- formula 1e0
- Outcome
- stem fresh weight and leaf fresh weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- soil and corn cobe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight and leaf fresh weight of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 1 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob”
Claim · model-written summary
Formula 2 improved stem and leaf dry weights and root fresh weight over controls.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- formula 2e0
- Outcome
- stem dry weight,leaf dry weight,root fresh weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- soil and corn cobe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the stem dry weight,leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight,leaf fresh weight and root-crown ratio of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 2 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob”
Claim · model-written summary
Formula 2 improved stem and leaf fresh weights and root-crown ratio over controls.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- formula 2e0
- Outcome
- stem fresh weight,leaf fresh weight and root-crown ratioe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- soil and corn cobe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the stem dry weight,leaf dry weight,root fresh weight,stem fresh weight,leaf fresh weight and root-crown ratio of pea seedlings cultivated in formula 2 were significantly or extremely significantly better than that of pea seedlings cultivated in soil and corn cob”
Claim · model-written summary
Both mixed substrate ratios were judged ideal for culturing pea seedlings.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- ideal for culturing pea seedlingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mixed substrates of sheep manure :corn cob(1∶5 and 2∶4) were ideal for culturing pea seedlings”
The same questions in other papers
growing medium · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
93 papers more in this group
See all 97 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.