Paper · 2015 · Americanae (AECID Library)

Fotossíntese, osmorregulação e crescimento inicial de quatro variedades de cana-de-açúcar submetidas à deficiência hídrica

Gonçalves, Eduardo Rebêlo

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The water deficiency of soil is a problem that affects good part of the areas cultivated in the world, over all, to those situated ones in the half-barren regions. The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil, where the limitation in the water availability for the plant affects the growth and the development of the plant, causing, excessively, social and economics damages. Thus, the present work had for purpose to evaluate, in comparative way, the response of four sugarcane varieties (SP79-1011, RB72454, RB98710 and RB92579) when submitted to water stress during the initial phase of vegetative growth, aiming to identify to morphophysiological characteristics and biochemists that may serve like markers, assisting, the genetics breedings programs of the culture in the crossing process and selection of new varieties. For this, the plants had been cultivated in greenhouse of the Academic Unit Center of Agrarian Sciences, Campus Delza Gitaí, of the UFAL, in Rio Largo, State of Alagoas. The study was a factorial (4 varieties x 3 levels of water based on field capacity [fc]), in completely randomized design with 5 replications. The levels of water in soil were defined like this: control (80 to 100% of fc), moderate stress (40 to 60% of fc) and severe stress (0 to 20% of fc). The analyzed variables had been: gaseous exchanges (stomatal conductance [gs], liquid photosynthesis [A] transpiration [E] and water use efficiency of the yield [WUEy]), fluorescence of chlorophyll a (Fv/Fm), leaf water potential (Ψw), photosynthetic pigments, organics solutes, number of tillers, diameter and height of stem, leaf area, final number of emitted leaf and production of biomass in all the parts of the plant. The data had been submitted to the analysis of variance and the averages compared between itself for the test of Tukey, with P < 0,05. The water deficiency provoked significant reductions in gs, E, A and in the WUEy, independent of the variety. Varieties SP79-1011 and RB98710 had presented greater stomatic sensitivity, reducing gs and E to the 71 days after beginning of stress of it, even under control. However, under such conditions the A was little affected, indicating that the plants are capable to keep the photosynthetic rate with stomata closed partially. The water stress provoked a little reduction in the potential photochemistry of the studied varieties. The RB72454 kept the base Ψw and midday more raised that most of varieties, independent of water condition, while the RB92579 presented the lesser values of Ψw under water stress conditions, indicating that the same one has ability of osmotic adjustment. The water deficiency reduced chlorophyll contents in all the varieties and it did not modify the carotenoids contents in varieties SP79-1011 and RB98710, providing to the same ones, bigger protection against the photo-oxidation. The water stress raised the levels of free proline in varieties SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579 and provoked reduction in the growth of the four sugarcane varieties, being that, the production of dry matter and the leaf had been more affected. The RB98710 presented increase in the relation root/shoot when submitted to severe water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency significantly reduced gs, E and A in sugarcane regardless of variety.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
water deficiencye1
Outcome
gs, E, Ae1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
independent of the varietye1
Setting
greenhousee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The water deficiency provoked significant reductions in gs, E, A and in the WUEy, independent of the variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1978 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“the plants had been cultivated in greenhouse of the Academic Unit Center of Agrarian Sciences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency significantly reduced water use efficiency of the yield (WUEy) in sugarcane regardless of variety.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
water deficiencye1
Outcome
WUEye1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
independent of the varietye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The water deficiency provoked significant reductions in gs, E, A and in the WUEy, independent of the variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1978 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SP79-1011 and RB98710 had greater stomatal sensitivity, reducing gs and E from 71 days after the start of stress, even under control.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
SP79-1011 and RB98710e4
Treatment
beginning of stresse4
Outcome
gs and Ee4
Direction
reducinge4
Qualifier
71 days after beginning of stresse4
Comparator
under controle4

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e4

“Varieties SP79-1011 and RB98710 had presented greater stomatic sensitivity, reducing gs and E to the 71 days after beginning of stress of it, even under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficiency photosynthesis (A) was little affected in these varieties, which kept the photosynthetic rate with stomata partly closed.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
water deficiencye1
Outcome
the Ae5
Direction
little affectede5
Qualifier
with stomata closed partiallye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The water deficiency provoked significant reductions in gs, E, A and in the WUEy, independent of the variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1978 · show in text ↑
e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, under such conditions the A was little affected, indicating that the plants are capable to keep the photosynthetic rate with stomata closed partially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress caused a slight reduction in the potential photochemistry of the studied varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
water stresse6
Outcome
potential photochemistrye6
Direction
reductione6
Qualifier
a littlee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e6

“The water stress provoked a little reduction in the potential photochemistry of the studied varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB92579 had the lowest leaf water potential (Ψw) under water stress, interpreted as an ability for osmotic adjustment.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
RB92579e3
Treatment
water stress conditionse3
Outcome
values of Ψwe3
Direction
lessere3
Qualifier
ability of osmotic adjustmente3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the RB92579 presented the lesser values of Ψw under water stress conditions, indicating that the same one has ability of osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2514–2659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency reduced chlorophyll content in all the varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
water deficiencye3
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
in all the varietiese3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“The water deficiency reduced chlorophyll contents in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2661–2731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency did not modify carotenoid content in SP79-1011 and RB98710, which the authors read as bigger protection against photo-oxidation.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
SP79-1011 and RB98710e4
Treatment
water deficiencye3
Outcome
carotenoids contentse4
Direction
did not modifye4
Qualifier
bigger protection against the photo-oxidatione4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“The water deficiency reduced chlorophyll contents in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2661–2731 · show in text ↑
e4

“it did not modify the carotenoids contents in varieties SP79-1011 and RB98710, providing to the same ones, bigger protection against the photo-oxidation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2736–2888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress raised free proline levels in SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579e3
Treatment
water stresse3
Outcome
levels of free prolinee3
Direction
raisede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“The water stress raised the levels of free proline in varieties SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2890–2984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced growth of the four sugarcane varieties.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Treatment
water stresse3
Outcome
growthe4
Direction
reductione4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The water stress raised the levels of free proline in varieties SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2890–2984 · show in text ↑
e4

“provoked reduction in the growth of the four sugarcane varieties, being that, the production of dry matter and the leaf had been more affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2989–3131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, dry matter and leaf production were more affected than other growth variables.

Taxon
sugarcanee4
Treatment
water stresse3
Outcome
the production of dry matter and the leafe4
Direction
more affectede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The water stress raised the levels of free proline in varieties SP79-1011, RB72454 and RB92579”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2890–2984 · show in text ↑
e4

“provoked reduction in the growth of the four sugarcane varieties, being that, the production of dry matter and the leaf had been more affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2989–3131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RB98710 increased the root/shoot ratio under severe water stress.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Material
RB98710e3
Treatment
severe water stresse3
Outcome
relation root/shoote3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The sugarcane is a culture in expansion in the Northeast of Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–230 · show in text ↑
e3

“The RB98710 presented increase in the relation root/shoot when submitted to severe water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3133–3228 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 4 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

drought · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.